Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 459

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bacterial colonization immediately after installation on oral titanium implants

Fürst, Mirjam M., Salvi, Giovanni E., Lang, Niklaus P., Persson, G. Rutger·2007·Clinical Oral Implants Research

Abstract

Background: Information on bacterial colonization immediately after dental implant insertion is limited. Aims: (1) To assess the early colonization on titanium implants immediately after placement and throughout the first 12 post‐surgical weeks, (2) to compare the microbiota at interproximal subgingival implant and adjacent tooth sites. Material and methods: Subgingival plaque samples from implant and neighbouring teeth were studied by checkerboard DNA–DNA hybridization before surgery, 30 min after implant placement, and 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after surgery. Results: Comparing bacterial loads at implant sites between 30 min after placement with 1‐week data showed that only the levels of Veillonella parvula (P<0.05) differed with higher loads at week 1 post‐surgically. Week 12 data demonstrated significantly higher bacterial loads for 15/40 species at tooth sites compared with pre‐surgery (P‐values varying between 0.05 and 0.01). Between the period immediately after surgery and 12 weeks at implant sites, 29/40 species was more commonly found at 12 weeks. Included among these bacteria at implant sites were Porphyromonas gingivalis (P<0.05), Tannerella forsythia, (P<0.01), and Treponema denticola (P<0.001). Immediately post‐surgery 5.9% of implants, and 26.2% of teeth, and at week 12, 15% of implants, and 39.1% of teeth harbored Staphylococcus aureus. Comparing tooth and implant sites, significantly higher bacterial loads were found at tooth sites for 27/40 species after 30 min following implant placement. This difference increased to 35/40 species at 12 weeks post‐surgically. Conclusions: Bacterial colonization occurred within 30 min after implant placement. Early colonization patterns differed between implant and tooth surfaces.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01381.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 459

Metadata

Authors
Fürst, M. M., Salvi, G. E., Lang, N. P., & Persson, G. R.
Venue
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-05-15
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
501-508
ISSN
  • 0905-7161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0501
OpenAlex
W2145287149
Cited by
459
References
3
FWCI
11.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial colonization immediately after installation on oral titanium implants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01381.x
The paper
Fürst, M. M., Salvi, G. E., Lang, N. P., & Persson, G. R. (2007). Bacterial colonization immediately after installation on oral titanium implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01381.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.