Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,462

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review

Wennerberg, Ann, Albrektsson, Tomas·2009·Clinical Oral Implants Research

Abstract

Aim: To analyse possible effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration. Materials and methods: Our analyses were centred on a PubMed search that identified 1184 publications of assumed relevance; of those, 1064 had to be disregarded because they did not accurately present in vivo data on bone response to surface topography. The remaining 120 papers were read and analysed, after removal of an additional 20 papers that mainly dealt with CaP‐coated and Zr implants; 100 papers remained and formed the basis for this paper. The bone response to differently configurated surfaces was mainly evaluated by histomorphometry (bone‐to‐implant contact), removal torque and pushout/pullout tests. Results and discussion: A huge number of the experimental investigations have demonstrated that the bone response was influenced by the implant surface topography; smooth (Sa<0.5 μm) and minimally rough (Sa 0.5–1 μm) surfaces showed less strong bone responses than rougher surfaces. Moderately rough (Sa>1–2 μm) surfaces showed stronger bone responses than rough (Sa>2 μm) in some studies. One limitation was that it was difficult to compare many studies because of the varying quality of surface evaluations; a surface termed ‘rough’ in one study was not uncommonly referred to as ‘smooth’ in another; many investigators falsely assumed that surface preparation per se identified the roughness of the implant; and many other studies used only qualitative techniques such as SEM. Furthermore, filtering techniques differed or only height parameters (Sa, Ra) were reported. Conclusions: • Surface topography influences bone response at the micrometre level. • Some indications exist that surface topography influences bone response at the nanometre level. • The majority of published papers present an inadequate surface characterization. • Measurement and evaluation techniques need to be standardized. • Not only height descriptive parameters but also spatial and hybrid ones should be used.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,462

Metadata

Authors
Wennerberg, A., & Albrektsson, T.
Venue
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07-24
Volume
20
Issue
s4
Pages
172-184
ISSN
  • 0905-7161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0501
OpenAlex
W1987654508
Cited by
1,462
References
0
FWCI
7.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x
The paper
Wennerberg, A., & Albrektsson, T. (2009). Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.