Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dimensions of buccal bone and mucosa at immediately placed implants after 7 years: a clinical and cone beam computed tomography study

Open access
Benic, Goran I., Mokti, Muizzaddin, Chen, Chun‐Jung, Weber, Hans‐Peter, Hämmerle, Christoph H. F., Gallucci, German O.·2012·Clinical Oral Implants Research

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the dimensions of buccal bone and soft tissue at immediately placed implants over a 7‐year period. Material and methods: Twenty‐four patients, that participated in a clinical prospective study and received implants immediately placed into extraction socket, were enrolled for this study. Residual bone defects were grafted with xenogenic bone substitute and covered by means of collagen membrane. Baseline examination included measurements of full‐mouth plaque and bleeding scores, width of keratinized mucosa, and dimensions of residual bone defects at the buccal aspect. Seven years after implant placement, full‐mouth plaque score, full‐mouth bleeding score, width of keratinized mucosa, and probing pocket depth were assessed and cone beam computed tomography images acquired. Dimensions of buccal bone and soft tissue were evaluated on the cross‐sectional cone beam computed tomography reconstructions. Differences between two time‐points were tested using the two‐sided t‐test. Correlation analysis was used to investigate the influence of baseline bone defect dimensions on the bone dimensions measured at the 7‐year follow‐up. Results and conclusions: Fourteen patients attended the follow‐up examination. In five implants almost no buccal bone was detected, whereas in the remaining nine implants the buccal bone was found covering the rough implant surface. No correlation was found between initial bone defects and bone dimensions at the follow‐up examination. The sites without radiographically detectable buccal bone at the 7‐year control presented with 1 mm more apical mucosal level in comparison to implants with intact buccal bone.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02253.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Benic, G. I., Mokti, M., Chen, C., Weber, H., Hämmerle, C. H. F., & Gallucci, G. O.
Venue
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09-08
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
560-566
ISSN
  • 0905-7161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0501
OpenAlex
W2168320161
Cited by
165
References
1
FWCI
5.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dimensions of buccal bone and mucosa at immediately placed implants after 7 years: a clinical and cone beam computed tomography study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02253.x
The paper
Benic, G. I., Mokti, M., Chen, C., Weber, H., Hämmerle, C. H. F., & Gallucci, G. O. (2012). Dimensions of buccal bone and mucosa at immediately placed implants after 7 years: a clinical and cone beam computed tomography study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02253.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.