Cited by 29Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchDental Health and Care UtilizationDental materials and restorations

Clinical and microbiological effects of daily brushing with either NaF or SnF2 gels in subjects with fixed or removable dental prostheses

Tinanoff, Norman, Manwell, Mary A., Zameck, Ricki L., Grasso, Joseph E.·1989·Journal of Clinical Periodontology

Abstract

Abstract 61 adults, with fixed or removable dental protheses, completed a 6‐month double‐blind trial comparing the clinical and microbial effects of brushing twice daily with either 0.22% NaF or 0.4% SnF 2. Those subjects brushing with SnF 2 had less gingivitis and fewer bleeding sites for both “total teeth” and “abutment teeth”. Plaque scores between groups were only statistically different for the “abutment teeth”. The microbial parameters, salivary S. mutans and subgingival plaque total CPU, were significantly reduced in the SnF 2 group. In both treatment groups, there was a reduction over the course of the study in the number of subjects with recoverable A. actinomycetemcomitans and black pigmented bacteroides. yet there was no difference between groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1989.tb01656.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longitudinal studies of distal extension removable dental prostheses indicate that a favorable periodontal prognosis may be expected provided periodontal disease is treated and adequate preprosthetic plaque control established, periodontal health and oral hygiene maintained through self-performed plaque control and periodic maintenance, and patient's motivation reinforced to enhance compliance.

    “Longitudinal studies of distal extension RDPs indicate that a favorable periodontal prognosis may be expected provided the following conditions are satisfied: 1) periodontal disease, if present, is treated and an adequate preprosthetic plaque control regimen established; 2) periodontal health and oral hygiene are maintained through selfperformed plaque control measures 104 and periodic maintenance”

    From Dental prostheses and tooth‐related factors (2018) · cites this paper as [104]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tinanoff, N., Manwell, M. A., Zameck, R. L., & Grasso, J. E.
Affiliations
UConn Health (US)
Corresponding author
Tinanoff, Norman
Venue
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1989-05
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
284-290
ISSN
  • 0303-6979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-051X
OpenAlex
W2078121910
Cited by
29
References
19
Citations by year
2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal Of Clinical Periodontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
Keywords
sodium fluoride, stannous fluoride, fluoride toothpaste, dental plaque, gingivitis, bleeding on probing, subgingival bacteria, Streptococcus mutans, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, black-pigmented Bacteroides, fixed partial dentures, removable prosthesis, abutment teeth
MeSH terms
Dental Abutments, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bacteria, Dental Plaque, Dentifrices, Denture, Partial, Fixed, Denture, Partial, Removable, Double-Blind Method, Fluorides, Gels, Gingivitis, Humans, Middle Aged, Saliva, Sodium Fluoride, Tin Fluorides, Toothbrushing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review