Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 415

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The characteristics of biofilms in peri‐implant disease

Open access
Mombelli, Andrea, Décaillet, Fabien·2011·Journal of Clinical Periodontology

Abstract

Mombelli A, Décaillet F. The characteristics of biofilms in peri‐implant disease. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38 (Suppl. 11): 203–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2010.01666.x. Aim: To describe the microbiota associated with peri‐implant disease, with a specific emphasis on the differential diagnosis of the condition. Material and Methods: The potentially relevant literature was preliminarily assessed via scoping searches to find the most appropriate search terms and the most efficient Boolean search algorithm. We identified 29 reports on subjects with osseointegrated implants, with a pathological condition compatible with the definition of “peri‐implant disease”, and reporting microbiological data from samples taken in affected sites. Results and Conclusions: In most studies bacterial samples were obtained by methods that destroy the three‐dimensional structure of the biofilm. The samples therefore describe mixtures of bacteria from unspecified districts of biofilm associated with peri‐implant diseases. Analyses of such samples with various methods indicate that peri‐implant disease maybe viewed as a mixed anaerobic infection. In most cases the composition of the flora is similar to the subgingival flora of chronic periodontitis that is dominated by Gram‐negative bacteria. Peri‐implant infections may occasionally be linked to a different microbiota, including high numbers of peptostreptococci or staphylococci. Beneficial effects of mechanical and chemical interventions to disrupt the peri‐implant biofilm demonstrate that microorganisms are involved in the disease process, even if they may not always be the origin of the condition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2010.01666.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Experimental gingivitis in man

    Löe, H., Theilade, E., & Jensen, S. B. (1965) · The Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1902/jop.1965.36.3.177 · Cited by 3,481 · cited 1×

    “In fact, using the experimental gingivitis model (originally described by Löe et al. 1965), a cause and effect relationship between biofilm formation on teeth and gingivitis, as well as on implants and peri-implant mucositis, can be demonstrated in humans (Pontoriero et al. 1994, Zitzmann et al.…”
    Method

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 415

Metadata

Authors
Mombelli, A., & Décaillet, F.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02-16
Volume
38
Issue
s11
Pages
203-213
ISSN
  • 0303-6979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-051X
OpenAlex
W1860307919
Cited by
415
References
1
FWCI
17.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The characteristics of biofilms in peri‐implant disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-051x.2010.01666.x
The paper
Mombelli, A., & Décaillet, F. (2011). The characteristics of biofilms in peri‐implant disease. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.2010.01666.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.