Cited by 418Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesFire effects on ecosystemsPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

Multiple interacting ecosystem drivers: toward an encompassing hypothesis of oak forest dynamics across eastern North America

McEwan, Ryan W., Dyer, James M., Pederson, Neil·2011·Ecography

Abstract

Many forests of eastern North American are undergoing a species composition shift in which maples ( Acer spp.) are increasingly important while oak ( Quercus spp.) regeneration and recruitment has become increasingly scarce. This dynamic in species composition occurs across a large and geographically complex region. The elimination of fire has been postulated as the driver of this dynamic; however, some assumptions underlying this postulate have not been completely examined, and alternative hypotheses remain underexplored. Through literature review, and a series of new analyses, we examined underlying assumptions of the “oak and fire” hypothesis and explored a series of alternative hypotheses based on well‐known ecosystem drivers: climate change, land‐use change, the loss of foundation and keystone species, and dynamics in herbivore populations. We found that the oak–maple dynamic began during a shift in climate regime‐from a time of frequent, severe, multi‐year droughts to a period of increased moisture availability. Anthropogenic disturbance on the landscape changed markedly during this same time, from an era of Native American utilization, to a time characterized by low population densities, to Euro‐American settlement and subsequent land transmogrification. During the initiation of the oak‐maple dynamic, a foundation species, the American chestnut, was lost as a canopy tree across a broad range. Several important browsers and acorn predators had substantial population dyn…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06390.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McEwan, R. W., Dyer, J. M., & Pederson, N.
Venue
Ecography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-08-13
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
244-256
ISSN
  • 0906-7590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0587
OpenAlex
W2160118363
Cited by
418
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 20
FWCI
13.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecography (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Keywords
oak, Acer, fire suppression, climate change, land use change, American chestnut, white-tailed deer, herbivore population dynamics, eastern North America, species composition change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review