Cited by 90Indoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureAir Quality and Health ImpactsAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Ultrafine particle concentrations and exposures in six elementary school classrooms in northern California: Ultrafine particle exposures in six classrooms

Open access
Mullen, N. A., Bhangar, S., Hering, S. V., Kreisberg, N. M., Nazaroff, W. W.·2011·Indoor Air

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Potential health risks may result from environmental exposure to ultrafine particles (UFP), i.e., those smaller than 0.1 μm in diameter. One important exposure setting that has received relatively little attention is school classrooms. We made time-resolved, continuous measurements of particle number (PN) concentrations for 2-4 school days per site (18 days total) inside and outside of six classrooms in northern California during normal occupancy and use. Additional time-resolved information was gathered on ventilation conditions, occupancy, and classroom activity. Across the six classrooms, average indoor PN concentrations when students were present were 5200-16,500/cm(3) (overall average 10,800/cm(3)); corresponding outdoor concentrations were 9000-26,000/cm(3) (overall average 18,100/cm(3)). Average indoor levels were higher when classrooms were occupied than when they were unoccupied because of higher outdoor concentrations and higher ventilation rates during occupancy. In these classrooms, PN exposures appear to be primarily attributable to outdoor sources. Indoor emission sources (candle use, cooking on an electric griddle, use of a heater, use of terpene-containing cleaning products) were seen to affect indoor PN concentrations only in a few instances. The daily-integrated exposure of students in these six classrooms averaged 52,000/cm(3) h/day for the 18 days monitored. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: This study provides data and insight concerning the UFP exposure levels children may encounter within classrooms and the factors that most significantly affect these levels in an urban area in northern California. This information can serve as a basis to guide further study of children's UFP exposure and the potential associated health risks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00690.x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Resuspension of particles by students' indoor activities affects the indoor particle concentration in occupied classrooms.

    “In school buildings, the resuspension of particles by students' indoor activities also affects the indoor particle concentration in occupied classrooms [28,29].”

    From Investigation of Indoor Air Quality and the Identification of Influential Factors at Primary Schools in the North of China (2017) · cites this paper as [29]

    The ‘Sources of particles in monitored classrooms’ section reports that a few indoor activities, including cooking and candle use, increased particle concentrations during student occupancy. It does not identify resuspension by students as the mechanism; the ‘Indoor and outdoor particle number concentrations’ section instead attributes generally higher occupied-classroom levels chiefly to ventilation, outdoor levels, and a few indoor sources. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mullen, N. A., Bhangar, S., Hering, S. V., Kreisberg, N. M., & Nazaroff, W. W.
Affiliations
  • Aerosol Dynamics (United States) (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Nazaroff, W. W.
Venue
Indoor Air
Published
2010-10-28
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
77-87
ISSN
0905-6947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164373378
Cited by
90
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Indoor Air (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
California Air Resources Board
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Keywords
ultrafine particles, particle number concentration, school classrooms, children's exposure, indoor air quality, ventilation, occupancy, cooking emissions, classroom activities, urban air pollution
MeSH terms
California, Child, Environmental Monitoring, Humans, Particle Size, Schools, Ventilation, Air Pollution, Indoor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review