The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The ecology of information: an overview on the ecological significance of making informed decisions
Abstract
Information is characterized as the reduction of uncertainty and by a change in the state of a receiving organism. Thus, organisms can acquire information about their environment that reduces uncertainty and increases their likelihood of choosing a best‐matching strategy. We define the ecology of information as the study of how organisms acquire and use information in decision‐making and its significance for populations, communities, landscapes and ecosystems. As a whole, it encompasses the reception and processing of information, decision‐making, and the ecological consequences of making informed decisions. The first two stages constitute the domains of, e.g. sensory ecology and behavioral ecology. The exploration of the consequences of information use at larger spatial and temporal scales in ecology has lagged behind these other disciplines. In our overview we characterize information, discuss statistical decision theory as a quantitative framework to analyze information and decision‐making, and discuss potential ecological ramifications. Rather than attempt a cursory review of the enormity of the scope of information we highlight information use in development, breeding habitat selection, and interceptive eavesdropping on alarm calls. Through these topics we discuss specific examples of ecological information use and the emerging ecological consequences. We emphasize recurring themes: information is collected from multiple sources, over varying temporal and spatial scales, and in many cases links heterospecifics to one another. We conclude by breaking from specific ecological contexts to explore implications of information as a central organizing principle, including: information webs, information as a component of the niche concept, and information as an ecosystem process. With information having such an enormous reach in ecology we further cast a spotlight on the potential harmful effects of anthropogenic noise and info‐disruption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecology of Fear: Optimal Foraging, Game Theory, and Trophic Interactions
Brown, J. S., Laundre, J. W., & Gurung, M. (1999) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.2307/1383287 · Cited by 1,347
Modelling territoriality and wolf–deer interactions
Lewis, M. A., & Murray, J. D. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/366738a0 · Cited by 203
Red colobus and Diana monkeys provide mutual protection against predators
BSHARY, R., & NOË, R. (1997) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.1997.0553 · Cited by 152
Cited by
Nagelkerken, I., & Munday, P. L. (2016) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13167 · Cited by 389
A scale‐dependent framework for trade‐offs, syndromes, and specialization in organismal biology
Agrawal, A. A. (2020) · Ecology · doi:10.1002/ecy.2924 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt, K. A., Dall, S. R. X., & Van Gils, J. A.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 304-316
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0706
- OpenAlex
- W2001043517
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ecology of information: an overview on the ecological significance of making informed decisions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17573.x
- The paper
- Schmidt, K. A., Dall, S. R. X., & Van Gils, J. A. (2010). The ecology of information: an overview on the ecological significance of making informed decisions. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17573.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.