The DOI matches its Crossref record.
pH-cycling of enamel and dentin lesions in the presence of low concentrations of fluoride
Abstract
F‐dentifrice usage causes slightly elevated fluoride levels in saliva. Therefore, the effects of permanent low fluoride concentrations versus daily dentifrice treatments were studied on enamel and dentin lesions in a pH‐cycling model of alternating demineralization and remineralization. Groups received 1) no fluoride treatment. 2) 3 μM (0.06 ppm) F continuously present during re‐ and demineralization or 3) daily 5–min F‐dentifrice treatments. Solutions were analyzed for changes in calcium and fluoride. Cumulative results (10 d) showed that for the non‐fluoride group the dentin lesions increased, while for enamel lesions mineral uptake and loss were balanced. Addition of 3 μM F caused small, non‐significant, enhancement of remineralization (1–7%). while demineralization was significantly inhibited for both tissues (9–23%). The daily dentifrice treatments resulted in a balance between mineral uptake and loss of dentin, due to inhibited demineralization (‐33%) and enhanced remineralization (+ 79%). For enamel, the F‐dentifrice treatments resulted in 43% reduction of demineralization, with no significant effect on remineralization. Fluoride loss from the 3 μM F cycling solutions was significant (up to 50%) and constant during the experimental period. Microradiographic analysis showed remineralization at the lesion front in enamel. In dentin, the lesion depth was increased in all groups, with concomitant mineral deposition in the surface region of the dentifrice group. Results indicate that slightly elevated fluoride levels may be considerably less effective in inhibiting lesion progression in dentin than in enamel, and suggest mineral uptake and loss to occur at similar depths for enamel lesions, while demineralization and remineralization occur at different depths in dentin.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dentine is more reactive to fluoride than enamel.
“It is well known that dentine is more reactive to fluoride than enamel [20]”
From Validation of a Cariogenic Biofilm Model to Evaluate the Effect of Fluoride on Enamel and Root Dentine Demineralization (2016) · cites this paper as [20]
For dentine, higher fluoride concentration is necessary to control caries.
“For dentine, higher fluoride concentration [19–23], higher frequency of use [24], or combination of methods of fluoride delivery [25] should be necessary to control caries; however, the evidence is not conclusive.”
From Validation of a Cariogenic Biofilm Model to Evaluate the Effect of Fluoride on Enamel and Root Dentine Demineralization (2016) · cites this paper as [20]
The present data extend those found by ten Cate et al. (1995), who showed that carious dentine incorporates more fluoride than enamel when treated with fluoride toothpaste and subjected to a chemical pH-cycling model.
“The present data extend those found by ten Cate et al. (1995), who showed that carious dentine incorporates more fluoride than enamel when treated with fluoride toothpaste and subjected to a chemical pH-cycling model.”
From Validation of a Cariogenic Biofilm Model to Evaluate the Effect of Fluoride on Enamel and Root Dentine Demineralization (2016) · cites this paper as ten Cate et al. (1995)
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Apm Jacobson, 1991, Effect of low fluoride levels in de/remineralising solutions of a pH‐cy‐cling model, Caries Kes, 25, 230
- 10.1177/00220345900690S120 · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345860650071101 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.14219/jada.archive.1988.0128 · DOI
- 10.1159/000260543 · DOI
- 10.1159/000260599 · DOI
- 10.1159/000262050 · DOI
- 10.1159/000262001 · DOI
- 10.1177/002203459207100S27 · DOI
- Fresen JA, 1968, The determination of fluoride in biological materials by means of gas chromtography, Pharm Weekblad, 103, 909
- 10.1159/000261479 · DOI
- ÖGaard B, 1983, Alkali soluble and alkali insoluble fluoride retention in demineralized enannel in vivo, Scand J Dent Res, 91, 200
- 10.1177/00220345870660081701 · DOI
- Rolla G., 1977, Concentration of fluoride in plaque ‐ a possible mechanism, Scand J Dent Res, 85, 149
- 10.1159/000261385 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159/000261525 · DOI
- 10.1159/000261455 · DOI
- Lagerweij MD, 1994, Plaque and fluoride effects on lesion formation in grooves in dentin, Caries Res, 28, 209
- 10.1159/000260667 · DOI
- Leach SA, 1985, Factors relating to demineralisation and remineralisation of the teeth, 23
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fernández, C. E., Tenuta, L. M. A., & Cury, J. A. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146478 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- ten Gate, J. M., Buijs, M. J., & Damen, J. J. M.
- Venue
- European Journal of Oral Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 362-367
- ISSN
- 0909-8836
- 1600-0722
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review