Cited by 74

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

pH-cycling of enamel and dentin lesions in the presence of low concentrations of fluoride

ten Gate, J.M., Buijs, M.J., Damen, J.J.M.·1995·European Journal of Oral Sciences

Abstract

F‐dentifrice usage causes slightly elevated fluoride levels in saliva. Therefore, the effects of permanent low fluoride concentrations versus daily dentifrice treatments were studied on enamel and dentin lesions in a pH‐cycling model of alternating demineralization and remineralization. Groups received 1) no fluoride treatment. 2) 3 μM (0.06 ppm) F continuously present during re‐ and demineralization or 3) daily 5–min F‐dentifrice treatments. Solutions were analyzed for changes in calcium and fluoride. Cumulative results (10 d) showed that for the non‐fluoride group the dentin lesions increased, while for enamel lesions mineral uptake and loss were balanced. Addition of 3 μM F caused small, non‐significant, enhancement of remineralization (1–7%). while demineralization was significantly inhibited for both tissues (9–23%). The daily dentifrice treatments resulted in a balance between mineral uptake and loss of dentin, due to inhibited demineralization (‐33%) and enhanced remineralization (+ 79%). For enamel, the F‐dentifrice treatments resulted in 43% reduction of demineralization, with no significant effect on remineralization. Fluoride loss from the 3 μM F cycling solutions was significant (up to 50%) and constant during the experimental period. Microradiographic analysis showed remineralization at the lesion front in enamel. In dentin, the lesion depth was increased in all groups, with concomitant mineral deposition in the surface region of the dentifrice group. Results indicate that slightly elevated fluoride levels may be considerably less effective in inhibiting lesion progression in dentin than in enamel, and suggest mineral uptake and loss to occur at similar depths for enamel lesions, while demineralization and remineralization occur at different depths in dentin.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1995.tb01858.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Apm Jacobson, 1991, Effect of low fluoride levels in de/remineralising solutions of a pH‐cy‐cling model, Caries Kes, 25, 230
  2. 10.1177/00220345900690S120 · DOI
  3. 10.1177/00220345860650071101 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.14219/jada.archive.1988.0128 · DOI
  5. 10.1159/000260543 · DOI
  6. 10.1159/000260599 · DOI
  7. 10.1159/000262050 · DOI
  8. 10.1159/000262001 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/002203459207100S27 · DOI
  10. Fresen JA, 1968, The determination of fluoride in biological materials by means of gas chromtography, Pharm Weekblad, 103, 909
  11. 10.1159/000261479 · DOI
  12. ÖGaard B, 1983, Alkali soluble and alkali insoluble fluoride retention in demineralized enannel in vivo, Scand J Dent Res, 91, 200
  13. 10.1177/00220345870660081701 · DOI
  14. Rolla G., 1977, Concentration of fluoride in plaque ‐ a possible mechanism, Scand J Dent Res, 85, 149
  15. 10.1159/000261385 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1159/000261525 · DOI
  17. 10.1159/000261455 · DOI
  18. Lagerweij MD, 1994, Plaque and fluoride effects on lesion formation in grooves in dentin, Caries Res, 28, 209
  19. 10.1159/000260667 · DOI
  20. Leach SA, 1985, Factors relating to demineralisation and remineralisation of the teeth, 23

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
ten Gate, J. M., Buijs, M. J., & Damen, J. J. M.
Venue
European Journal of Oral Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-12
Volume
103
Issue
6
Pages
362-367
ISSN
  • 0909-8836
  • 1600-0722
Cited by
74
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review