Cited by 84Vanadium and Halogenation ChemistryExercise and Physiological ResponsesTrace Elements in Health

Oral Vanadyl Sulphate Does not Affect Blood Cells, Viscosity or Biochemistry in Humans

Open access
Fawcett, J. P., Farquhar, S. J., Thou, T., Shand, B. I.·1997·Pharmacology & Toxicology

Abstract

Abstract: Vanadyl sulphate (VOSO 4) is used to improve performance in weight training athletes. Concerns about its safety have arisen because vanadium compounds may cause anaemia and changes in the leukocyte system. In this study, the effects of oral VOSO 4 (0.5 mg/kg/day) on haematological indices (red and white cell and platelet counts, red cell mean cell volume and haemoglobin level), blood viscosity (haematocrit, plasma viscosity and blood viscosity at 10s−1 and 100s−1 shear rates) and biochemistry (lipids and indices of liver and kidney function) were investigated in a twelve week, double blind, placebo controlled trial in 31 weight training athletes. Blood viscosity was evaluated at 0, 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks and haematological indices and biochemistry were measured before and at the end of treatment. Both the treatment group and placebo group showed increases in haematocrit (3.3‐3.6%) and blood viscosity (9‐11% at 100s−1 shear; 35‐38% at 10s−1 shear) but there were no significant effects of treatment. Similarly there were no treatment effects on haematological indices and biochemistry. Concerns about the adverse effects of oral vanadyl sulphate on blood are not supported by the results of this trial.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1997.tb00397.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No studies are available that support the ability of vanadyl sulfate supplementation to impact strength or muscle mass in non-diabetic individuals who are currently resistance training.

    “However, no studies are available that support the ability of vanadyl sulfate supplementation to impact strength or muscle mass in non-diabetic individuals who are currently resistance training [412, 413].”

    From ISSN exercise & sports nutrition review update: research & recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [413]

    The Methods (p. 1) confirm that participants were non-diabetic weight-training athletes, and the Discussion (p. 3) reports no effect on body weight. But this paper does not report strength or muscle-mass outcomes or establish that no studies support an effect; its introduction (p. 1) directs readers to an earlier paper for body-composition and performance results. Searched for strength, muscle mass, body composition, and performance findings. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gerrard, D. F., J. P. Fawcett & S. J. Farquhar: Vanadium use by athletes (letter). N.Z. Med. J. 1993, 106, 259.
  2. Ramanadham, S., J. J. Mongold, R. W. Brownsey, G. H. Cros & J. H. McNeill: Oral vanadyl sulfate in the treatment of diabetic rats. Amer. J. Physiol. 1989, 257, H904–H911.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fawcett, J. P., Farquhar, S. J., Thou, T., & Shand, B. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Christchurch Hospital (NZ)
Corresponding author
Fawcett, J. P.
Venue
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-04
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
202-206
ISSN
0901-9928 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039117027
Cited by
84
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmacology & Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Otago Medical Research Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Vanadium and Halogenation Chemistry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Trace Elements in Health
Keywords
vanadyl sulfate, blood viscosity, hematological parameters, hematocrit, plasma viscosity, anemia, liver function, renal function, lipid profile, supplement safety, shear rate
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Cell Count, Blood Cells, Blood Chemical Analysis, Blood Pressure, Blood Viscosity, Body Weight, Female, Hematocrit, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Weight Lifting, Vanadium Compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review