Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 816

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review of the evidence supporting melatonin's role as an antioxidant

Reiter, Russel J., Melchiorri, Daniela, Sewerynek, Ewa, Poeggeler, Burkhard, Barlow‐Walden, Lorneli, Chuang, Jihing, Ortiz, Genaro Gabriel, AcuñaCastroviejo, Dario·1995·Journal of Pineal Research

Abstract

Abstract:This survey summarizes the findings, accumulated within the last 2 years, concerning melatonin's role in defending against toxic free radicals. Free radicals are chemical constituents that have an unpaired electron in their outer or‐bital and, because of this feature, are highly reactive. Inspired oxygen, which sustains life, also is harmful because up to 5% of the oxygen (O 2) taken in is converted to oxygen‐free radicals. The addition of a single electron to O 2 produces the superoxide anion radical (O 2); C 2: is catalytic‐reduced by superoxide dismutase, to hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2). Although H 2 O 2 is not itself a free radical, it can be toxic at high concentrations and, more importantly, it can be reduced to the hydroxyl radical (OH). The OH is the most toxic of the oxygen‐based radicals and it wreaks havoc within cells, particularly with macromolecules. In recent in vitro studies, melatonin was shown to be a very efficient neutralizer of the OH; indeed, in the system used to test its free radical scavenging ability it was found to be significantly more effective than the well known antioxidant, glutathione (GSH), in doing so. Likewise, melatonin has been shown to stimulate glutathione peroxidase (GSH‐Px) activity in neural tissue; GSH‐PX metabolizes reduced glutathione to its oxidized form and in doing so it converts H 2 O 2 to H 2 O, thereby reducing generation of the OH by eliminating its precursor. More recent studies have shown that melatonin is also a more efficient scavenger of the peroxyl radical than is vitamin E. The peroxyl radical is generated during lipid peroxidation and propagates the chain reaction that leads to massive lipid destruction in cell membranes. In vivo studies have demonstrated that melatonin is remarkably potent in protecting against free radical damage induced by a variety of means. Thus, DNA damage resulting from either the exposure of animals to the chemical carcinogen safrole or to ionizing radiation is markedly reduced when melatonin is co‐administered. Likewise, the induction of cataracts, generally accepted as being a consequence of free radical attack on lenticular macromolecules, in newborn rats injected with a GSH‐depleting drug are prevented when the animals are given daily melatonin injections. Also, paraquat‐induced lipid peroxidation in the lungs of rats is overcome when they also receive melatonin during the exposure period. Paraquat is a highly toxic herbicide that inflicts at least part of its damage by generating free radicals. Finally, bacterial endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide or LPS)‐induced free radical damage to a variety of organs is highly significantly reduced when melatonin is also administered; LPS, like paraquat, produces at least part of its damage to cells by inducing the formation of free radicals. Physiological melatonin concentrations have also been shown to inhibit the nitric oxide (NO)‐generting enzyme, nitric oxide synthase. The reduction of NO‐ production would contribute to melatonin's antioxidant action since NO‐ can generate the peroxynitrite anion, which can degrade into the OH. Thus, melatonin seems to have multiple ways either to reduce free radical generation or, once produced, to neutralize them. Melatonin accomplishes these actions without membrane receptors, indicating that the indole has important metabolic functions in every cell in the organism, not only those that obviously contain membrane receptors for this molecule.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-079x.1995.tb00133.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 816

Metadata

Authors
Reiter, R. J., Melchiorri, D., Sewerynek, E., Poeggeler, B., Barlow‐Walden, L., Chuang, J., Ortiz, G. G., & AcuñaCastroviejo, D.
Venue
Journal of Pineal Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
1-11
ISSN
  • 0742-3098 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-079X
OpenAlex
W2058232887
Cited by
816
References
3
FWCI
24.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of the evidence supporting melatonin's role as an antioxidant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-079x.1995.tb00133.x
The paper
Reiter, R. J., Melchiorri, D., Sewerynek, E., Poeggeler, B., Barlow‐Walden, L., Chuang, J., Ortiz, G. G., & AcuñaCastroviejo, D. (1995). A review of the evidence supporting melatonin's role as an antioxidant. Journal of Pineal Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-079x.1995.tb00133.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.