Cited by 36Skin Protection and AgingFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery TechniquesDermatologic Treatments and Research

Tensile properties and contours of aging facial skin. A controlled double‐blind comparative study of the effects of retinol, melibiose‐lactose and their association

Piérard‐Franchimont, C., Castelli, D., Cromphaut, I. Van, Bertin, C., Ries, G., Cauwenbergh, G., Piérard, G. E.·1998·Skin Research and Technology

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Facial aging is accompanied by modifications in the tensile properties and contours of skin. In the present study we instrumentally assessed and compared the effect of either 0.04% retinol (ROL), 1% melibiose and 4% lactose (ME-L) and their association (ROL-ME-L) to increase the firmness and smoothness of facial skin. A 1 % salicylic acid (SA) emulsion served as a cosmetic product reference. METHODS: A total of 120 women were allocated to four randomized groups of 30 subjects, each group receiving one of the test products or a combination of test products. The tensile properties of facial skin were measured using the Cutometer® on seven occasions during the 12-week treatment and during a 4-week post-treatment phase. Fine lines and wrinkles were assessed on replicas by using image analysis after optical shadowing. RESULTS: Significant differences in efficacy and lingering activity were observed between products. SA brought the weakest beneficial effects. ROL and ME-L provided better efficacy on both the tensile properties and contours of skin. They differed slightly according the nature of the biometrological variables. The combination ROL-ME-L achieved similar or even better results than the best of its components for each given physical property of skin. CONCLUSIONS: ROL, ME-L, and ROL-ME-L formulations improve physical properties of skin that are impaired by aging. Their activities are notably superior to those of a comparative SA formulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0846.1998.tb00116.x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A retinol formulation improved the physical properties of ageing facial skin, including tensile properties and contours, after 12 weeks of treatment.

    “Pierard-Franchimont et al. showed that a retinol formulation improved the physical properties of ageing facial skin, including tensile properties and contours, after 12 weeks of treatment [43].”

    From Bioactive Compounds for Skin Health: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as [43]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Piérard‐Franchimont, C., Castelli, D., Cromphaut, I. V., Bertin, C., Ries, G., Cauwenbergh, G., & Piérard, G. E.
Affiliations
Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US)
Venue
Skin Research and Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-11
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
237-243
ISSN
  • 0909-752X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0846
OpenAlex
W2004260437
Cited by
36
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Skin Research and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
facial skin aging, skin firmness, skin smoothness, retinol, melibiose, lactose, salicylic acid, wrinkles, cosmetic formulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review