The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The statistical structure of short-range forecast errors as determined from radiosonde data. Part I: The wind field
Open accessAbstract
This paper analyses the statistical structure of the errors of the short-range wind forecasts used in the global data assimilation system at ECMWF, by verifying the forecasts against radiosonde data over North America. The kinematics of two-dimensional homogeneous turbulence is used to partition the perceived forecast errors into prediction errors which are horizontally correlated, and observational errors which are assumed to be horizontally uncorrelated. The theory further partitions the wind prediction errors into three components, viz. large-scale, rotational and divergent components, and provides a spectral description of the covariance and cross-covariance functions for stream function and velocity potential. The calculations also provide an estimate of the vertical error covariance matrices for prediction error and for radiosonde observational error, by which we mean the combined effects of instrumental error and errors of representativeness. The basic assumptions are that the forecast errors are horizontally homogeneous and that the observational errors are horizontally uncorrelated. Several important results are found. The wind prediction errors are comparable in magnitude with the wind observation errors. The prediction errors are dominated by the synoptic scales, but there is a substantial large scale wind error which reverses phase between the stratosphere and troposphere. The synoptic scale errors are largely non-divergent in the troposphere. There are good grounds for increasing the resolution of the analysis system, both in the horizontal and the vertical, over North America and other data-rich regions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence
Batchelor, G. K. (1953) · Cited by 2,903
On the probable error of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample
Fisher, R. A. (1921) · Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) · Cited by 2,089
Retrieval of atmospheric temperature and composition from remote measurements of thermal radiation
Rodgers, C. D. (1976) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/rg014i004p00609 · Cited by 1,464
Advanced Calculus for Applications
Hildebrand, F. B. (1970) · Cited by 1,023
On the Statistical Theory of Isotropic Turbulence
de Karman, T., & Howarth, L. (1938) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A - Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1938.0013 · Cited by 968
Korrelationstheorie der station�ren stochastischen Prozesse
Khintchine, A. (1934) · Mathematische Annalen · doi:10.1007/bf01449156 · Cited by 919
Objective Analysis of Meteorological Fields
Gandin, L. S. (1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 826
A Global Three-Dimensional Multivariate Statistical Interpolation Scheme
Lorenc, A. C. (1981) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1981)109<0701:agtdms>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 562
Data Assimilation by Statistical Interpolation of Forecast Error Fields
Rutherford, I. D. (1972) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · Cited by 137
FGGE 4-dimensional Data Assimilation at ECMWF
Bengtsson, L. O., Kanamitsu, M., Kållberg, P. W., & Uppala, S. M. (1982) · Cited by 128
Cited by
Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation and Predictability
Kalnay, E. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802270 · Cited by 3,391
A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2
Skamarock, W., Klemp, J., Dudhia, J., Gill, D., Barker, D., & Wang, W. (2005) · NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research · doi:10.5065/d6dz069t · Cited by 2,504
The ECMWF implementation of three‐dimensional variational assimilation (3D‐Var). I: Formulation
Courtier, P., Andersson, E., Heckley, W., Vasiljevic, D., Hamrud, M., Hollingsworth, A., Rabier, F., Fisher, M., & Pailleux, J. (1998) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.49712455002 · Cited by 668
Self-citationData assimilation in the presence of forecast bias
Dee, D. P., & Da Silva, A. M. (1998) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.49712454512 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Hollingsworth, A., & Lönnberg, P.
- Venue
- Tellus A Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-01-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 111-111
- ISSN
- 0280-6495 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121685656
- Cited by
- 561
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 7.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The statistical structure of short-range forecast errors as determined from radiosonde data. Part I: The wind field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0870.1986.tb00460.x
- The paper
- Hollingsworth, A., & Lönnberg, P. (1986). The statistical structure of short-range forecast errors as determined from radiosonde data. Part I: The wind field. Tellus A Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.1986.tb00460.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.