Cited by 198Medication Adherence and ComplianceRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsDialysis and Renal Disease Management

Diagnostic Accuracy of Measurement Methods to Assess Non-Adherence to Immunosuppressive Drugs in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Open access
Schäfer-Keller, P., Steiger, J., Bock, A., Denhaerynck, K., De Geest, S.·2008·American Journal of Transplantation

Abstract

Valid assessment of immunosuppressive therapy non-adherence (NAH) is vital: NAH is associated with negative transplantation outcomes. We studied the diagnostic accuracy of assay, patient self-reports and clinicians' collateral reports and composite adherence scores using electronic monitoring (EM) as a reference standard. This cross-sectional study included a convenience sample of 249 adult kidney transplant recipients (Ktx) (female: 43.4%; mean age 53.6 [SD: 12.7], median 7 years [IQR: 9 years] post-Ktx). NAH was assessed using EM over 3 months (i.e. reference standard), assays of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, mycophenolat-mofetil, patients' self-reports and clinicians' collateral reports. The constructed composite adherence score included assay, self-reports and collateral reports. NAH's prevalence across the measurement methods was EM: 17.3%; assay: 33% (cyclosporine: 25.8%; tacrolimus: 35.1%; mycophenolat-mofetil: 40.2%); self-report: 12.4%; collateral reports: 24.9% and composite adherence score: 38.9%, respectively. The composite adherence score and collateral reports showed the highest and lowest sensitivities to NAH (72.1% and 15.8%, respectively). Specificity was highest for collateral reports of at least three clinicians (93.1%). Likelihood ratio of a positive test was 2.74 for composite adherence score. No measures showed high sensitivity alongside high specificity. Combining measures increased diagnostic accuracy, indicating the relevance of combined measures for clinical and research purposes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02127.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MEMS results have been compared to patients' and clinicians' reports with weak to moderate correlation.

    “MEMS results have been compared to patients’ and clinicians’ reports with weak to moderate correlation[28–30].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schäfer-Keller, P., Steiger, J., Bock, A., Denhaerynck, K., & De Geest, S.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital of Basel (CH)
  • University of Basel (CH)
Venue
American Journal of Transplantation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
616-626
ISSN
1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024823143
Cited by
198
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
11.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Transplantation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (58697)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Keywords
medication non-adherence, kidney transplant recipients, immunosuppressants, electronic medication monitoring, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, self-reported adherence, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Kidney Transplantation, Treatment Refusal, Drug Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review