Cited by 26Medication Adherence and ComplianceMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsUsability and User Interface Design

A New Electronic Monitoring Device to Measure Medication Adherence: Usability of the Helping Hand™

Open access
De Bleser, Leentje, Vincke, Birgit, Dobbels, Fabienne, Happ, Mary Beth, Maes, Bart, Vanhaecke, Johan, De Geest, Sabina·2010·Sensors

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the user performance, satisfaction and acceptability of the Helping Hand™ (B&O Medicom) electronic medication adherence monitor. Using a mixed-method design, we studied 11 kidney transplant patients and 10 healthy volunteers during three weeks. Although testing showed positive usability aspects, several areas requiring technical improvement were identified: the most important obstacles to usability and acceptability were the weak sound signal, problems loading the medication, and the fact that only one medication could be used at a time.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s100301535

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Bleser, L., Vincke, B., Dobbels, F., Happ, M. B., Maes, B., Vanhaecke, J., & De Geest, S.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Health Services and Nursing Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 box 7001, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Heilig-Hart Ziekenhuis Roeselare-Menen, Wilgenstraat 2, Roeselare, Belgium
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2010-03-01
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
1535-1552
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115988006
Cited by
26
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (K24NR010244)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
medication adherence, helping hand, usability, user satisfaction, acceptability, renal transplant patients, acoustic signals
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Electronics, Medical, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Transplantation, Case-Control Studies, Kidney Transplantation, Tacrolimus, Reminder Systems, Patient Satisfaction, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review