Cited by 169Dental Radiography and ImagingEndodontics and Root Canal TreatmentsDental Trauma and Treatments

Clinical indications for digital imaging in dento‐alveolar trauma. Part 2: root resorption

Open access
Cohenca, Nestor, Simon, James H., Mathur, Aeshna, Malfaz, Jose Maria·2007·Dental Traumatology

Abstract

Abstract – Common complications of dento‐alveolar trauma are pulp necrosis, pulp canal obliteration, periapical pathosis and root resorption. Different types of root resorption have been identified with traumatic injuries. Repair‐related (surface), infection‐related (inflammatory), ankylosis‐related (osseous replacement) or extraradicular invasive cervical resorption are among the most common. Recent developments in imaging systems have enabled clinicians to visualize structural changes effectively. The diagnosis and three‐dimensional imaging assessment of the resorption is important in order to determine the treatment complexity and expected outcome based on the location and extension of the root defect. This article discusses and illustrates the clinical application of cone beam computed tomography for diagnosis and treatment plan of root resorption. Four clinical cases are presented to illustrate the potential use of the NewTom 3G for root resorption.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2006.00546.x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]25. Brezniak N, Wasserstein A. Orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption. Part I: the basic science aspects. Angle Orthod 2002;72:175-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohenca, N., Simon, J. H., Mathur, A., & Malfaz, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Cohenca, Nestor
Venue
Dental Traumatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-12-05
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
105-113
ISSN
  • 1600-4469 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-9657
OpenAlex
W2086480292
Cited by
169
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dental Traumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Radiography and Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Dental Trauma and Treatments
Keywords
root resorption, cone-beam computed tomography, pulp necrosis, periapical lesions, pulp canal obliteration, inflammatory root resorption, invasive cervical resorption, 3D imaging, treatment planning
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Dental Pulp Necrosis, Female, Humans, Incisor, Male, Mandibular Fractures, Root Resorption, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Tooth Injuries, Radiography, Dental, Digital, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review