Cited by 27

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Progressive cognitive decline in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease overexpressing mutant hAPPswe

Middei, S., Daniele, S., Caprioli, A., Ghirardi, O., Ammassari‐Teule, M.·2006·Genes, Brain and Behavior

Abstract

The possibility of detecting progressive changes in cognitive function reflecting the spatio‐temporal pattern of β‐amyloid peptide (Aβ) deposition was investigated in Tg2576 mice overexpressing the human mutant amyloid precursor protein (hAPP). Here, we show that at 7 months of age, Tg2576 mice exhibited a selective deficit in hippocampus‐based operations including a defective habituation of object exploration, a lack of reactivity to spatial novelty and a disruption of allothetic orientation in a cross‐shaped maze. At 14 months of age, Tg2576 mice displayed a more extended pattern of behavioral abnormalities, because they failed to react to object novelty and exclusively relied on motor‐based orientation in the cross‐shaped maze. However, an impaired reactivity to spatial and object novelty possibly reflecting age‐related attention deficits also emerged in aged wild‐type mice. These findings further underline that early cognitive markers of AD can be detected in Tg2576 mice before Aβ deposition occurs and suggest that as in humans, cognitive deterioration progressively evolves from an initial hippocampal syndrome to global dementia because of the combined effect of the neuropathology and aging.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1601-183x.2005.00160.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Defective spatial learning and memory are known to be early symptoms of Alzheimer's disease.

    “Defective spatial learning and memory are known to be early symptoms of AD (Middei et al., 2006; Bizon et al., 2007; Good and Hale, 2007; Reed et al., 2010).”

    From VPS35 haploinsufficiency increases Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology (2011) · cites this paper as Middei et al., 2006

  • Tg2576 mice normally develop AD-like phenotypes, including cognitive deficits and Aβ deposits, at age at least 10 mo or older.

    “Tg2576 mice normally develop AD-like phenotypes, including cognitive deficits and Aβ deposits, at the age of at least 10 mo or older (Chapman et al., 1999; Middei et al., 2006; Bizon et al., 2007).”

    From VPS35 haploinsufficiency increases Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology (2011) · cites this paper as Middei et al., 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Ammassari‐Teule M., 1995, Reactions to spatial and non spatial change in two inbred strains of mice: further evidence supporting the hippocampal dysfunction hypothesis in the DBA/2 strain, Psychobiol, 23, 284, 10.3758/BF03333075 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/6374 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/35050103 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-08-03547.2003 · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.1090349 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03643.x · DOI
  7. 10.1037//0735-7044.116.4.722 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0031-9384(68)90167-4 · DOI
  9. 10.1037/0735-7044.117.6.1283 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0197-4580(00)00249-9 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0149-7634(83)90014-3 · DOI
  12. 10.1126/science.1072994 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1159/000106633 · DOI
  14. 10.1023/A:1021691918517 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1126/science.274.5284.99 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1101/lm.70104 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.11.007 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00639-X · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0166-4328(99)00037-6 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0969-9961(03)00079-2 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1002/jnr.20127 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.04.002 · DOI
  23. 10.1101/lm.80604 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.03.018 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/nrn1433 · DOI
  26. 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12881 · DOI
  27. 10.1006/nlme.1996.0007 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/hipo.10007 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/brain/122.3.383 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00079-2 · DOI
  31. 10.1037//0735-7044.103.5.1009 · DOI
  32. 10.1037/h0040678 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.09.009 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1126/science.1074069 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1002/ana.410300410 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/0166-4328(96)00016-2 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.09.004 · DOI
  38. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-05-01858.2002 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/0163-1047(90)91380-T · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Middei, S., Daniele, S., Caprioli, A., Ghirardi, O., & Ammassari‐Teule, M.
Venue
Genes, Brain and Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-07-29
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
249-256
ISSN
  • 1601-1848
  • 1601-183X
Cited by
27
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review