Cited by 51Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMemory and Neural MechanismsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Impaired conditioned taste aversion learning in APP transgenic mice

Janus, Christopher, Welzl, Hans, Hanna, Amanda, Lovasic, Lana, Lane, Nancy, St. George-Hyslop, Peter, Westaway, David·2004·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Cognition in transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been predominantly characterized in explicit spatial orientation tasks. However, dementia in AD encompasses also implicit memory systems. In the present study a line of transgenic mice (TgCRND8) encoding a double mutated allele of the human amyloid precursor protein (APP) genes was evaluated in an implicit associative learning task of conditioned taste aversion (CTA). CTA is a form of Pavlovian classical conditioning, in which a mouse learns to avoid a novel taste of saccharine (conditioned stimulus) paired with an experimentally induced (systemic injection of lithium chloride) nausea (unconditioned stimulus). In contrast to conditioned non-Tg mice, TgCRND8 APP mice developed weaker aversion against saccharine and quickly increased its consumption in repeated tests. These results indicate that TgCRND8 mice show a significant impairment not only in explicit spatial memory, as has been previously shown [Nature 408 (2000) 979], but also in implicit memory. Control experiments confirmed that TgCRND8 and non-Tg mice had comparable taste sensitivities in response to appetitive as well as aversive tastes. The study suggests that the CTA paradigm can be a sensitive tool to evaluate deficits in implicit associative learning in APP transgenic mouse models of AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.11.007

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interaction with testing environment or personnel cannot explain the discrepancy, since the cognitive tests in the present study were run by the same PI and assistant as previously published work on APP CRND8 mice.

    “In addition, interaction with testing environment [38,39], or personnel cannot explain the discrepancy, since the cognitive tests in the present study were run by the same PI (CJ) and assistant (AH) as our previously published work on APP CRND8 mice [10,25,34].”

    From Normal cognition in transgenic BRI2-Aβ mice (2013) · cites this paper as [34]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janus, C., Welzl, H., Hanna, A., Lovasic, L., Lane, N., St. George-Hyslop, P., & Westaway, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Janus, Christopher
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-10
Volume
25
Issue
9
Pages
1213-1219
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081342701
Cited by
51
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer Society
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
conditioned taste aversion, Alzheimer's disease, APP transgenic mice, amyloid precursor protein, implicit memory, associative learning, spatial memory
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Avoidance Learning, Cerebral Cortex, Conditioning, Psychological, Disease Models, Animal, Hippocampus, Learning Disabilities, Memory Disorders, Mice, Transgenic, Mutation, Taste, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Transgenes, Mice, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review