Cited by 243Infant Development and Preterm CareNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Kangaroo mother care for low birthweight infants: a randomized controlled trial in different settings

Abstract

A randomized controlled trial was carried out for 1 y in three tertiary and teaching hospitals, in Addis Ababa (Ethiopia), Yogyakarta (Indonesia) and Merida (Mexico), to study the effectiveness, feasibility, acceptability and cost of kangaroo mother care (KMC) when compared to conventional methods of care (CMC). About 29% of 649 low birthweight infants (LBWI; 1000‐1999 g) died before eligibility. Of the survivors, 38% were excluded for various reasons, 149 were randomly assigned to KMC (almost exclusive skin‐to‐skin care after stabilization), and 136 to CMC (warm room or incubator care). There were three deaths in each group and no difference in the incidence of severe disease. Hypothermia was significantly less common in KMC infants in Merida (13.5 vs 31.5 episodes/100 infants/d) and overall (10.8 vs 14.6). Exclusive breastfeeding at discharge was more common in KMC infants in Merida (80% vs 16%) and overall (88% vs 70%). KMC infants had a higher mean daily weight gain (21.3 g vs 17.7 g) and were discharged earlier (13.4 vs 16.3 d after enrolment). KMC was considered feasible and presented advantages over CMC in terms of maintenance of equipment. Mothers expressed a clear preference for KMC and health workers found it safe and convenient. KMC was cheaper than CMC in terms of salaries (US$ 11 788 vs US$ 29 888) and other running costs (US$ 7501 vs US$ 9876). This study confirms that hospital KMC for stabilized LBWI 1000‐1999 g is at least as effective and safe as CMC, and shows that it is feasible in different settings, acceptable to mothers of different cultures, and less expensive. Where exclusive breastfeeding is uncommon among LBWI, KMC may bring about an increase in its prevalence and duration, with consequent benefits for health and growth. For hospitals in low‐income countries KMC may represent an appropriate use of scarce resources.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1998.tb01769.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Few studies report the correlation of PAT with SBP in infants, mainly in the context of sleep studies and as a screening method rather than a core clinical tool, and none report measurements of PTT in this critical care population.

    “Few studies report the correlation of PAT with SBP in infants, mainly in the context of sleep studies and as screening method rather than a core clinical tool.35,36 None report measurements of PTT in this critical care population.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Rey ES, 1983, Curso de Medicina Fetal
  2. Davanzo R, 1992, Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Kangaroo Mother Program, Bogota, Colombia, November 1990, 451
  3. SchmidtE WittreichG.Care of the abnormal newborn: a random controlled trial study of the “kangaroo method” of care of low birt weight newborns. In:WHO. Consensus Conference on Appropriate Technology following Birth Trieste 711 October 1986
  4. Syfrett EB, 1993, Early and virtually continuous kangaroo care for lower‐risk preterm infants: effect on temperature, breastfeeding, supplementation and weight
  5. Cattaneo A, (on behalf of the International Network on Kangaroo Mother Care). Kangaroo mother care in low‐income countries, J Trop Pediatr

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cattaneo, A., Davanzo, R., Worku, B., Surjono, A., Echeverria, M., Bedri, A., Haksari, E., Osorno, L., Gudetta, B., Setyowireni, D., Quintero, S., & Tamburlini, G.
Affiliations
  • Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Dr. Sardjito (ID)
  • Centro Medico Nacional Siglo XXI (MX)
Corresponding author
Cattaneo, A
Venue
Acta Paediatrica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-09
Volume
87
Issue
9
Pages
976-985
ISSN
  • 0365-1436 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-5253
  • 1651-2227
OpenAlex
W2157222016
Cited by
243
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 17
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Paediatrica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
kangaroo mother care, low birth weight infants, skin-to-skin care, neonatal hypothermia, exclusive breastfeeding, infant weight gain, neonatal mortality, low-income countries
MeSH terms
Breast Feeding, Developing Countries, Ethiopia, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Indonesia, Infant Care, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Infant, Newborn, Mexico, Touch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review