Cited by 170Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumInfant Development and Preterm CareInfant Health and Development

Maternal depression is associated with mother–infant interaction in preterm infants

Korja, Riikka, Savonlahti, Elina, Ahlqvist‐Björkroth, Sari, Stolt, Suvi, Haataja, Leena, Lapinleimu, Helena, Piha, Jorma, Lehtonen, Liisa +1 more·2008·Acta Paediatrica

Abstract

AIM: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and the background factors of maternal depressive symptoms and their relation to the quality of mother-infant interaction in a group of preterm infants and their mothers. METHODS: The signs of maternal depression were evaluated in 125 mothers of very preterm infants (birth weight < or = 1500 g or < 32 gestational weeks) at 6 months of infant's corrected age using Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). The association between maternal depressive symptoms and the quality of mother-infant interaction as assessed by the parent child early relational assessment method (PCERA) method was studied at 6 and 12 months of corrected age in 32 preterm infants who were their mothers' firstborn infants and singletons. RESULTS: The prevalence of depression assessed by EPDS in mothers of very preterm infants was 12.6%. Most interestingly, the number of postnatal signs of depression associated negatively with the quality of the maternal interaction behaviour with their preterm infants. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that maternal depression may be a risk factor in the development of the mother-infant relationship between preterm infants and their mothers. Therefore, it would be important to identify signs of depression in mothers of preterm infants to offer early support.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00733.x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Korja, R., Savonlahti, E., Ahlqvist‐Björkroth, S., Stolt, S., Haataja, L., Lapinleimu, H., Piha, J., Lehtonen, L., & the PIPARI study group
Affiliations
  • Turku University Hospital (FI)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Korja, Riikka
Venue
Acta Paediatrica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04-15
Volume
97
Issue
6
Pages
724-730
ISSN
  • 0365-1436 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-5253
  • 1651-2227
OpenAlex
W2090781652
Cited by
170
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Paediatrica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
maternal depression, mother-infant interaction, preterm infants, very preterm birth, postpartum depression, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, mother-infant relationship, risk factors
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Maternal Welfare, Mother-Child Relations, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Depression, Postpartum, Infant, Very Low Birth Weight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review