The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Happily Ever After? Cohabitation, Marriage, Divorce, and Happiness in Germany
Abstract
In Germany the life satisfaction of those in first marriages traces the following average course. Starting from a baseline of life satisfaction in noncohabiting years one or more years prior to marriage, those who cohabit prior to marriage have an increase in life satisfaction significantly above the baseline. In the year of marriage and that immediately following, the life satisfaction of those in first marriages, prior cohabitors and noncohabitors combined, increases to a value even further above the baseline, significantly higher than for premarital cohabitors. Thereafter, life satisfaction of those in first marriages drops, but remains significantly above the baseline, at the same level as for premarital cohabitors. Compared with the population generally, those in first marriages are selective with regard to a number of socioeconomic characteristics, but not in regard to personality traits. Those whose first marriage ends in separation or divorce have a life satisfaction trajectory in the years before and during marriage not significantly different from that described above, but separation or divorce reduces this group’s life satisfaction to the original baseline value. This group differs significantly from the first marriage population as a whole in its selectivity – lower socioeconomic status and personality traits less conducive to marriage. The roots of prospective dissolution thus apparently lie in this group’s distinctive socioeconomic and personality traits, and not in a disparate course of life satisfaction in the first years of marriage. We are grateful to the University of Southern California for financial support, and to Jeffrey B. Nugent,
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Happiness Is a Stochastic Phenomenon
Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00355.x · Cited by 1,719
Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status.
Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.527 · Cited by 1,357
Unemployment Alters the Set Point for Life Satisfaction
Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01501002.x · Cited by 1,327 · cited 1×
“Elsewhere, they conclude that unemployment has a lasting effect on well-being, altering the happiness setpoint (Lucas et al. 2004).”
BackgroundTime Does Not Heal All Wounds: A Longitudinal Study of Reaction and Adaptation to Divorce
Lucas, R. E. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01642.x · Cited by 492
Becoming Married and Mental Health: A Longitudinal Study of a Cohort of Young Adults
Horwitz, A. V., White, H. R., & Howell-White, S. (1996) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/353978 · Cited by 407
Cited by
Psychological well-being: evidence regarding its causes and consequences
Huppert, F. A. (2009) · Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1111/j.1758-0854.2009.01008.x · Cited by 1,583
Pohl, T. T., Young, L. J., & Bosch, O. J. (2019) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.12.011 · Cited by 83
International Evidence on Well-Being
Blanchflower, D. G. (2009) · Measuring the Subjective Well-Being of Nations · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226454573.003.0008 · Cited by 67
Mencarini, L., Vignoli, D., Zeydanli, T., & Kim, J. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0206202 · Cited by 50
Li, C., & Li, M. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17082957 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Zimmermann, A. C., & Easterlin, R. A.
- Venue
- Population and Development Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 511-528
- ISSN
- 0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
- 1728-4457
- OpenAlex
- W2032232426
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 45.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.