Fermentation quality and chemical composition of shrub silage treated with lactic acid bacteria inoculants and cellulase additives
Abstract
Effects of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) inoculants and cellulase additives on fermentation quality and chemical compositions of shrub silages were studied by using a small-scale fermentation system. Two LAB inoculants of Qingbao (Lactobacillus plantarum, Pediococcus acidilacticii, Lactobacillus casei and Clostridium phage) and Caihe (Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus brevis and Pediococcus acidilactici) and a commercial cellulase made from Trichoderma reesei were used as additives for intermediate pea-shrub, rush bushclover, arborescent ceratoides and shrubby silage preparation. The crude protein, neutral detergent fiber and water-soluble carbohydrate contents of the four shrub materials were 10.1-14.2, 62.6-67.2 and 1.9-3.5% on a dry matter basis, respectively. All shrub silages had pH 3.40-4.43, ammonia-N 0.1-0.2% g/kg and lactic acid 1.3-2.9% on a fresh matter basis. The silage quality of LAB-inoculated silages did not have a greater effect than control silages, except shrubby silage preparation. Silages treated with the cellulase, the pH of rush bushclover and shrubby sweetvetch silage were significantly (P < 0.05) lower and the lactic acid content were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than the control silages. The results confirmed that shrub contained a relatively high content of crude protein; its silages can be preserved in good quality, and they are new potential resources for livestock feed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Different strains have different responses to different environments, pH values, and effects, and their fermentation by combining strains can improve the fermentation efficiency, quality, aerobic stability, and antimicrobial capacity of mixed silage.
“However, different strains have different responses to different environments, pH values, and effects, and their fermentation by combining strains can improve the fermentation efficiency, quality, aerobic stability, and antimicrobial capacity of mixed silage [9,10].”
This may be due to the slow pH decline in high-moisture mixed silage, resulting in an inability to immediately suppress microbial activity, thus reducing bacterial diversity.
“This may be due to the slow pH decline in high-moisture mixed silage, resulting in an inability to immediately suppress microbial activity, thus reducing bacterial diversity [9].”
Cites
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(91)78551-2 · Cited by 28,658 · see citing works
Nitrogen Fractions in Selected Feedstuffs
Krishnamoorthy, U., Muscato, T. V., Sniffen, C. J., & Soest, P. J. V. (1982) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(82)82180-2 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Zahiroddini, H., Baah, J., Absalom, W., & McAllister, T. A. (2004) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.08.013 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Effects of Enzyme-Inoculant Systems on Preservationand Nutritive Value of Haycrop and Corn Silages
Chen, J., Stokes, M. R., & Wallace, C. R. (1994) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(94)76978-2 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Effects of an Enzyme Additive on Composition of Corn Silage Ensiled at Various Stages of Maturity
Sheperd, A. C., & Kung, L. (1996) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(96)76544-x · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Nadeau, E. M., Russell, J. R., & Buxton, D. R. (2000) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/2000.78112980x · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Weinberg, Z. G., Ashbell, G., Azrieli, A., & Bruckental, I. (1993) · Grass and Forage Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1993.tb01838.x · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Bale Density and Moisture Effects on Alfalfa Round Bale Silage
Han, K. J., Collins, M., Vanzant, E. S., et al. (2004) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.9140 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
An Enzyme Additive for Corn Silage: Effects on Silage Composition and Animal Performance
Sheperd, A. C., & Kung, L. (1996) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(96)76543-8 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
A Repeatable Model System for Silage Fermentation in Culture Tubes
Tanaka, O., & Ohmomo, S. (1994) · Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1271/bbb.58.1407 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
The role of lactic acid bacteria in the preparation of high fermentation quality
Cai, Y. (2001) · Grassland Science · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationBiochemical Composition of Caragana.korshinskii Kom.in Helingeer County of Inner Mongolia
Wang, L. (2008) · Ganhanqu ziyuan yu huanjing · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhao, C., Wang, L., Ma, G., Jiang, X., Yang, J., Lv, J., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11020334 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“This may be due to the slow pH decline in highmoisture mixed silage, resulting in an inability to immediately suppress microbial activity, thus reducing bacterial diversity [9].”
BackgroundLIU, Q.-H., LI, X.-Y., Desta, S. T., ZHANG, J.-G., & SHAO, T. (2016) · Journal of Integrative Agriculture · doi:10.1016/s2095-3119(15)61233-3 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
- Authors
- SUN, Q., GAO, F., YU, Z., TAO, Y., ZHAO, S., & CAI, Y.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
- China Agricultural University (CN)
- Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JP)
- Corresponding author
- YU, Zhu
- ORCID
- Venue
- Animal Science Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-10-18
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 305-309
- ISSN
- 1344-3941 (ISSN-L)
- 1740-0929
- OpenAlex
- W1562189994
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Animal Science Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Keywords
- lactic acid bacteria inoculant, Trichoderma reesei, silage fermentation quality, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, water-soluble carbohydrates, silage pH, ammonia-N, lactic acid, animal feed
- MeSH terms
- Carbohydrates, Cellulase, Dietary Fiber, Fermentation, Lactobacillaceae, Proteins, Silage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
