Cited by 101Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsFamily and Matrimonial Law

Intimate Partner Violence, Parental Divorce, and Child Custody: Directions for Intervention and Future Research*

Hardesty, Jennifer L., Chung, Grace H.·2006·Family Relations

Abstract

Joint custody and cooperative coparenting are often unsafe for women who leave violent partners. Although certain legal protections are available, more work is needed to understand and address abused women's needs in this context. This study provides divorce scholars and practitioners with information on the interface between separation/divorce and intimate partner violence. We review existing research, policies, and programs and propose directions for intervention and research that center around the unique needs of these families.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00370.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • IPV commonly continues after women leave, either through continued physical assaults or sexual assaults.

    “IPV commonly continues after women leave (Hardesty & Chung, 2006) either through continued physical assaults (Brownridge et al., 2008; Fleury et al., 2000; Humphreys & Thiara, 2003; Rezey, 2020), or sexual assaults (DeKeseredy et al., 2004).”
  • Mothers experiencing IPV face barriers to safety post-separation because they must negotiate co-parenting arrangements and family court.

    “Mothers experiencing IPV face barriers to safety post-separation because they must negotiate co-parenting arrangements and family court (Broughton & Ford-Gilboe, 2017; Hardesty & Chung, 2006; Spearman et al., 2022; Stark & Hester, 2019).”

    From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Hardesty & Chung, 2006

  • For parents with minor children, legal systems and policies that regulate divorce, separation and custody are the central context influencing the ability to maintain safety following separation from an abusive partner.

    “For parents with minor children, legal systems and policies that regulate divorce, separation and custody are the central context influencing the ability to maintain safety following separation from an abusive partner (Broughton & Ford-Gilboe, 2017; Hardesty & Chung, 2006; Jaffe et al., 2008; Saunders, 2007; Wuest et al., 2006).”

    From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Hardesty & Chung, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hardesty, J. L., & Chung, G. H.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Hardesty, Jennifer L.
Venue
Family Relations
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03-09
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
200-210
ISSN
  • 0197-6664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3729
OpenAlex
W2046162674
Cited by
101
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Family Relations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Law › Family and Matrimonial Law
Keywords
intimate partner violence, parental divorce, child custody, joint custody, battered women, separation, intervention program, family policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review