The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Timing of Divorce: Predicting When a Couple Will Divorce Over a 14‐Year Period
Abstract
This paper investigates the predictability of divorce in a long‐term, prospective longitudinal study. Past research has indicated that 2 periods can be considered the most critical for the survival of marriages: (a) the first 7 years of marriage, during which half of all divorces are known to occur, and (b) the period during which the first child reaches 14 years of age, which has been suggested as a low point for marital satisfaction in the life course. In the present study, interaction variables at Time 1 (both during conflict and in an events‐of‐the‐day discussion following separation of the spouses for at least 8 hours) and noninteractive variables were used to predict divorcing both early and later in the marriage. A different set of variables predicted early divorcing than predicted later divorcing. Negative affect during conflict predicted early divorcing, but it did not predict later divorcing. By contrast, the lack of positive affect in events‐of‐the‐day and conflict discussions predicted later divorcing, but it did not predict early divorcing. Prediction was possible over the 14‐year period of the study with a model that included marital satisfaction, thoughts of marital dissolution, and affective interaction in both conversations. The model predicted divorce with 93% accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (2019) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t27734-000 · Cited by 6,019
Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions
Gottman, J. M., Coan, J., Carrere, S., & Swanson, C. (1998) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/353438 · Cited by 1,121
Self-citation
Cited by
Research on Divorce: Continuing Trends and New Developments
Amato, P. R. (2010) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00723.x · Cited by 1,918
Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., & Fontaine, J. (2008) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022107311854 · Cited by 864
Romantic love and sexual desire in close relationships
Gonzaga, G. C., Turner, R. A., Keltner, D., Campos, B., & Altemus, M. (2006) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.163 · Cited by 292
Mikulincer, M., Florian, V., Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (2002) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.41309.x · Cited by 271
It's more than sex: exploring the dyadic nature of sleep and implications for health
Troxel, W. M. (2010) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e3181de7ff8 · Cited by 225
“In particular, marital research has shown that the presence of intense negative affect during the first 7 years of marriage is the strongest predictor of marital dissolution, whereas in longer-term marriages (lasting >7 years), the absence of positive affect, particularly in situations that “should” elicit positive af…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Marriage and Family
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 737-745
- ISSN
- 0022-2445 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3737
- OpenAlex
- W2001286441
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Timing of Divorce: Predicting When a Couple Will Divorce Over a 14‐Year Period. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00737.x
- The paper
- Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2000). The Timing of Divorce: Predicting When a Couple Will Divorce Over a 14‐Year Period. Journal of Marriage and Family. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00737.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.