Cited by 30Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and EducationMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Is it time for standards for reporting on research about implementation?

Rycroft‐Malone, Jo, Burton, Christopher R.·2011·Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2011.00232.x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rycroft‐Malone, J., & Burton, C. R.
Venue
Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-11-28
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
189-190
ISSN
  • 1545-102X (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-6787
OpenAlex
W2047465009
Cited by
30
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
reporting guidelines, implementation research, reporting quality, evidence-based nursing
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Publishing, Clinical Nursing Research, Information Dissemination, Evidence-Based Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review