Is it time for standards for reporting on research about implementation?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Better reporting allows for a coherent synthesis of evidence, application and scaling of the TMFs to other contexts, thereby contributing to implementation science.
“Better reporting allows for a coherent synthesis of evidence, application and scaling of the TMFs to other contexts, thereby contributing to the implementation science [93].”
From The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [93]
Cites
Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations
GREENHALGH, T., ROBERT, G., MACFARLANE, F., BATE, P., & KYRIAKIDOU, O. (2004) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.0887-378x.2004.00325.x · Cited by 7,448 · see citing works
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04337-3 · Cited by 5,373 · see citing works
Moher, D., Cook, D. J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D., & Stroup, D. F. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04149-5 · Cited by 4,826 · see citing works
Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance
Craig, P., Dieppe, P. A., MacIntyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., & Petticrew, M. P. (2006) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 1,877 · see citing works
Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory
May, C. R., Mair, F., Finch, T., MacFarlane, A., Dowrick, C., Treweek, S., Rapley, T., Ballini, L., Ong, B. N., Rogers, A., et al. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-29 · Cited by 1,409 · see citing works
REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK).
for the Statistics Subcommittee of the NCI-EORTC Working Group on Cancer Diagnostics, McShane, L. M., Altman, D. G., Sauerbrei, W., Taube, S. E., Gion, M., & Clark, G. M. (2005) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602678 · Cited by 1,394 · see citing works
Ferlie, E. B., & Shortell, S. M. (2001) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.00206 · Cited by 1,335 · see citing works
Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C., Glasziou, P., Irwig, L., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2003) · PubMed · doi:10.1373/49.1.1 · Cited by 861 · see citing works
An exploration of the factors that influence the implementation of evidence into practice
Rycroft‐Malone, J., Harvey, G., Seers, K., Kitson, A., McCormack, B., & Titchen, A. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01007.x · Cited by 623 · see citing works
Self-citationCONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts
Hopewell, S., Clarke, M., Moher, D., Wager, E., Middleton, P., Altman, D. G., & Schulz, K. F. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61835-2 · Cited by 458 · see citing works
"Brimful of STARLITE": toward standards for reporting literature searches.
Booth, A. (2006) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement
Pinnock, H., Barwick, M., Carpenter, C. R., Eldridge, S., Grandes, G., Griffiths, C. J., Rycroft-Malone, J., Meissner, P., Murray, E., Patel, A., et al. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i6795 · Cited by 1,446 · see citing works
Self-citationPinnock, H., Epiphaniou, E., Sheikh, A., Griffiths, C., Eldridge, S., Craig, P., & Taylor, S. J. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0235-z · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Shin, H. D., Hamovitch, E., Gatov, E., MacKinnon, M., Samawi, L., Boateng, R., Thorpe, K. E., & Barwick, M. (2025) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000418 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“Review of the NASSS framework use over time other contexts, thereby contributing to the implementation science [93].”
- Authors
- Rycroft‐Malone, J., & Burton, C. R.
- Venue
- Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-11-28
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 189-190
- ISSN
- 1545-102X (ISSN-L)
- 1741-6787
- OpenAlex
- W2047465009
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- reporting guidelines, implementation research, reporting quality, evidence-based nursing
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Publishing, Clinical Nursing Research, Information Dissemination, Evidence-Based Nursing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review