The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Outcomes of allogenic acellular matrix therapy in treatment of diabetic foot wounds: an initial experience
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of persons with UT grade 2A neuropathic diabetic foot wounds treated with an acellular matrix. Data were abstracted for 17 consecutive patients with diabetes – 76·5% males, aged 61·5 ± 8·5 years with a mean glycated haemoglobin of 9·2 ± 2·2% presenting for care at a large, multidisciplinary wound care centre. All patients received surgical debridement for their diabetic foot wounds and were placed on therapy consisting of a single application of an acellular matrix graft (GraftJacket™; Wright Medical Technologies, Arlington, TN, USA) with dressing changes taking place weekly. Outcomes evaluated included time to complete wound closure and proportion of patients achieving wound closure in 20 weeks. Acellular matrix therapy was used as initial therapy and was sutured or stapled in place under a silicone‐based non adherent dressing. Therapy was then followed by a moisture‐retentive dressing until complete epithelialisation. In total, 82·4% of wounds measuring a mean 4·6 ± 3·2 cm 2 healed in the 20‐week evaluation period. For those that healed in this period, healing took place in a mean 8·9 ± 2·7 weeks. We conclude that a regimen consisting of moist wound healing using an acellular matrix dressing may be a useful adjunct to appropriate diabetic foot ulcer care for deep, non infected, non ischaemic wounds. We await the completion of further trials in this area to confirm or refute this initial assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The pooled average time to heal for ADM group is around 2e7 weeks shorter than that reported by previous retrospective studies [22,25].”
From Efficacy and safety of acellular dermal matrix in diabetic foot ulcer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- 10.1001/jama.293.2.217 · DOI
- 10.1093/milmed/146.9.644 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02596446 · DOI
- Gibbons G, 1984, Management of diabetic foot problems., 97
- 10.2337/diacare.6.1.87 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0168-8227(96)01199-0 · DOI
- 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1042 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1067-2516(97)80062-2 · DOI
- Reiber GE, 1996, The epidemiology of diabetic foot problems, Diabet Med, 13, S6, 10.1002/dme.1996.13.s1.6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/00007611-199906000-00008 · DOI
- Ashry HR, 1996, Hospital charges and length of stay for diabetes related amputations in minorities, Diabetes Care, 45, 25A
- 10.1016/S0168-8227(97)00058-2 · DOI
- 10.2337/diacare.13.5.513 · DOI
- 10.2337/diacare.19.4.350 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1067-2516(02)80020-5 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1524-475X.1999.00201.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2337/diacare.24.2.290 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1997.tb00476.x · DOI
- 10.2337/diacare.17.6.557 · DOI
- 10.1001/archinte.158.3.289 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/107110079701800106 · DOI
- Pollo FE, 2003, Plantar pressures in fiberglass total contact casts vs. a new diabetic walking boot, Foot Ankle Int, 24, 45, 10.1177/107110070302400107 · DOI
- 10.1001/archsurg.137.7.822 · DOI
- 10.2337/diacare.24.2.290 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0741-5214(95)70245-8 · DOI
- Gentzkow GD, 1999, Improved healing of diabetic foot ulcers after grafting with a living human dermal replacement, Wounds, 11, 77
- 10.1089/1076327041887709 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.sap.0000122651.12811.3d · DOI
- Huo MH, 2004, Collagen changes of allografting an acellular dermal matrix, Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi, 20, 51
- 10.1016/j.addr.2003.08.003 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.TA.0000068241.66186.00 · DOI
- 10.1097/00000658-200103000-00015 · DOI
- Brigido SA, 2004, Effective management of major lower extremity wounds using an acellular regenerative tissue matrix: a pilot study, Orthopedics, 27, s145, 10.3928/0147-7447-20040102-14 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
The Extracellular Matrix in Wound Healing: A Closer Look at Therapeutics for Chronic Wounds
Agren, M. S., & Werthen, M. (2007) · The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds · doi:10.1177/1534734607301394 · Cited by 136
Guo, X., Mu, D., & Gao, F. (2017) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.008 · Cited by 80
Sui, L., Xie, Q., Jiang, H.-T., & Li, X.-D. (2024) · BMC Endocrine Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12902-024-01550-3 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, B. R., Sangalang, M., Wu, S., & Armstrong, D. G.
- Venue
- International Wound Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-165
- ISSN
- 1742-4801
- 1742-481X
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.