Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 57

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Outcomes of allogenic acellular matrix therapy in treatment of diabetic foot wounds: an initial experience

Martin, Billy R, Sangalang, Melinda, Wu, Stephanie, Armstrong, David G·2005·International Wound Journal

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of persons with UT grade 2A neuropathic diabetic foot wounds treated with an acellular matrix. Data were abstracted for 17 consecutive patients with diabetes – 76·5% males, aged 61·5 ± 8·5 years with a mean glycated haemoglobin of 9·2 ± 2·2% presenting for care at a large, multidisciplinary wound care centre. All patients received surgical debridement for their diabetic foot wounds and were placed on therapy consisting of a single application of an acellular matrix graft (GraftJacket™; Wright Medical Technologies, Arlington, TN, USA) with dressing changes taking place weekly. Outcomes evaluated included time to complete wound closure and proportion of patients achieving wound closure in 20 weeks. Acellular matrix therapy was used as initial therapy and was sutured or stapled in place under a silicone‐based non adherent dressing. Therapy was then followed by a moisture‐retentive dressing until complete epithelialisation. In total, 82·4% of wounds measuring a mean 4·6 ± 3·2 cm 2 healed in the 20‐week evaluation period. For those that healed in this period, healing took place in a mean 8·9 ± 2·7 weeks. We conclude that a regimen consisting of moist wound healing using an acellular matrix dressing may be a useful adjunct to appropriate diabetic foot ulcer care for deep, non infected, non ischaemic wounds. We await the completion of further trials in this area to confirm or refute this initial assessment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1742-4801.2005.00099.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1001/jama.293.2.217 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/milmed/146.9.644 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/BF02596446 · DOI
  4. Gibbons G, 1984, Management of diabetic foot problems., 97
  5. 10.2337/diacare.6.1.87 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/0168-8227(96)01199-0 · DOI
  7. 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1042 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S1067-2516(97)80062-2 · DOI
  9. Reiber GE, 1996, The epidemiology of diabetic foot problems, Diabet Med, 13, S6, 10.1002/dme.1996.13.s1.6 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1097/00007611-199906000-00008 · DOI
  11. Ashry HR, 1996, Hospital charges and length of stay for diabetes related amputations in minorities, Diabetes Care, 45, 25A
  12. 10.1016/S0168-8227(97)00058-2 · DOI
  13. 10.2337/diacare.13.5.513 · DOI
  14. 10.2337/diacare.19.4.350 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S1067-2516(02)80020-5 · DOI
  16. 10.1046/j.1524-475X.1999.00201.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.2337/diacare.24.2.290 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1997.tb00476.x · DOI
  19. 10.2337/diacare.17.6.557 · DOI
  20. 10.1001/archinte.158.3.289 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1177/107110079701800106 · DOI
  22. Pollo FE, 2003, Plantar pressures in fiberglass total contact casts vs. a new diabetic walking boot, Foot Ankle Int, 24, 45, 10.1177/107110070302400107 · DOI
  23. 10.1001/archsurg.137.7.822 · DOI
  24. 10.2337/diacare.24.2.290 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/S0741-5214(95)70245-8 · DOI
  26. Gentzkow GD, 1999, Improved healing of diabetic foot ulcers after grafting with a living human dermal replacement, Wounds, 11, 77
  27. 10.1089/1076327041887709 · DOI
  28. 10.1097/01.sap.0000122651.12811.3d · DOI
  29. Huo MH, 2004, Collagen changes of allografting an acellular dermal matrix, Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi, 20, 51
  30. 10.1016/j.addr.2003.08.003 · DOI
  31. 10.1097/01.TA.0000068241.66186.00 · DOI
  32. 10.1097/00000658-200103000-00015 · DOI
  33. Brigido SA, 2004, Effective management of major lower extremity wounds using an acellular regenerative tissue matrix: a pilot study, Orthopedics, 27, s145, 10.3928/0147-7447-20040102-14 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Martin, B. R., Sangalang, M., Wu, S., & Armstrong, D. G.
Venue
International Wound Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-06
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
161-165
ISSN
  • 1742-4801
  • 1742-481X
Cited by
57
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.