The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development and Validation of a Five-Factor Sexual Satisfaction and Distress Scale for Women: The Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women (SSS-W)
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: This article presents data based on the responses of over 800 women who contributed to the development of the Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women (SSS-W). Aim: The aim of this study was to develop a comprehensive, multifaceted, valid, and reliable self-report measure of women's sexual satisfaction and distress. Methods: Phase I involved the initial selection of items based on past literature and on interviews of women diagnosed with sexual dysfunction and an exploratory factor analysis. Phase II involved an additional administration of the questionnaire, factor analyses, and refinement of the questionnaire items. Phase III involved administration of the final questionnaire to a sample of women with clinically diagnosed sexual dysfunction and controls. Results: Psychometric evaluation of the SSS-W conducted in a sample of women meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for female sexual dysfunction and in a control sample provided preliminary evidence of reliability and validity. The ability of the SSS-W to discriminate between sexually functional and dysfunctional women was demonstrated for each of the SSS-W domain scores and total score. Conclusion: The SSS-W is a brief, 30-item measure of sexual satisfaction and sexual distress, composed of five domains supported by factor analyses: contentment, communication, compatibility, relational concern, and personal concern. It exhibits sound psychometric properties and has a demonstrated ability to discriminate between clinical and nonclinical samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Social Work · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,519
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
Widiger, T. A. (2000) · Encyclopedia of Psychology, Vol. 3. · doi:10.1037/10518-009 · Cited by 19,744
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Siegel, L. J., & Fletcher‐Janzem, E. (2008) · Encyclopedia of Special Education · doi:10.1002/9780470373699.speced0655 · Cited by 8,477
Rosen, C. B. (2000) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/009262300278597 · Cited by 6,593
Sexual Dysfunction in the United States: Prevalence and Predictors
Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., & Rosen, R. C. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.6.537 · Cited by 5,119
Short Marital-Adjustment and Prediction Tests: Their Reliability and Validity
Locke, H. J., & Wallace, K. M. (1959) · Marriage and Family Living · doi:10.2307/348022 · Cited by 2,913
The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research.
Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3 · Cited by 2,608
Organic Causes of Erectile Dysfunction in Men Under 40
Ludwig, W., & Phillips, M. (2014) · Urologia Internationalis · doi:10.1159/000354931 · Cited by 2,156
Derogatis, L. R., Rosen, R., Leiblum, S., Burnett, A., & Heiman, J. (2002) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/00926230290001448 · Cited by 791
Frequency of Sexual Dysfunction in “Normal” Couples
Frank, E., Anderson, C., & Rubinstein, D. (1978) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197807202990302 · Cited by 648
Cited by
Psychological and interpersonal dimensions of sexual function and dysfunction
Brotto, L., Atallah, S., Johnson-Agbakwu, C., Rosenbaum, T., Abdo, C., Byers, E. S., Graham, C., Nobre, P., & Wylie, K. (2016) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.019 · Cited by 439
Role of sexual self-disclosure in the sexual satisfaction of long-term heterosexual couples
MacNeil, S., & Byers, E. S. (2009) · Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224490802398399 · Cited by 264
Sexual vs. Non-sexual trauma, sexual satisfaction and function, and mental health in female veterans
DiMauro, J., Renshaw, K. D., & Blais, R. K. (2018) · Journal of Trauma & Dissociation · doi:10.1080/15299732.2018.1451975 · Cited by 58
A systematic review of sexual distress measures
Santos-Iglesias, P., Mohamed, B., & Walker, L. M. (2018) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.02.020 · Cited by 51
Psychosocial Profile of Women with Premenstrual Syndrome and Healthy Controls: A Comparative Study
Kleinstäuber, M., Schmelzer, K., Ditzen, B., Andersson, G., Hiller, W., & Weise, C. (2016) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-016-9564-9 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Meston, C., & Trapnell, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Sexual Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-01-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 66-81
- ISSN
- 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-6109
- OpenAlex
- W1788852004
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and Validation of a Five-Factor Sexual Satisfaction and Distress Scale for Women: The Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women (SSS-W). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.20107.x
- The paper
- Meston, C., & Trapnell, P. (2005). Development and Validation of a Five-Factor Sexual Satisfaction and Distress Scale for Women: The Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women (SSS-W). The Journal of Sexual Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.20107.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.