Wide Variability in Laboratory Reference Values for Serum Testosterone
Abstract
Introduction: The laboratory determination of testosterone levels consistent with a diagnosis of hypogonadism is complicated by the availability of multiple testosterone assays and varying reference ranges. Aim: To assess current laboratory practices regarding availability of testosterone assays and use of reference values. Methods: A telephone survey of 12 academic, 12 community medical laboratories, and one national laboratory. Main Outcome Measures: Types of androgen assays offered and determination of reference values. Results: All of the academic and eight of the community centers performed total testosterone testing. Free testosterone was performed in-house by six of the 12 academic and one community center. Testing for bioavailable testosterone, free androgen index, and percent free testosterone was performed in-house by no more than two centers. There were eight and four different assays used for total and free testosterone, respectively. One national laboratory offered equilibrium dialysis measurement of free testosterone. Of the 25 labs, there were 17 and 13 different sets of reference values for total and free testosterone, respectively. The low reference value for total testosterone ranged from 130 to 450 ng/dL (350% difference), and the upper value ranged from 486 to 1,593 ng/dL (325% difference). Age-adjusted reference values were applied in four centers for total testosterone and in seven labs for free testosterone. All reference values were based on a standard statistical model without regard for clinical aspects of hypogonadism. Twenty-three of the 25 lab directors responded that clinically relevant testosterone reference ranges would be preferable to current standards. Conclusions: Laboratory reference values for testosterone vary widely, and are established without clinical considerations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reference ranges for free T may not be universally valid; different methods and cohort characteristics may generate different intervals.
“Finally, for both measured and calculated free T, reference ranges may not be universally valid. Depending on the method to assess free T as well as characteristics of the cohort, different intervals may be generated [177, 229].”
From Role of sex hormone-binding globulin in the free hormone hypothesis and the relevance of free testosterone in androgen physiology (2022) · cites this paper as [229]
Cites
A Critical Evaluation of Simple Methods for the Estimation of Free Testosterone in Serum
Vermeulen, A., Verdonck, L., & Kaufman, J. M. (1999) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.84.10.6079 · Cited by 3,824 · see citing works
Risks of testosterone-replacement therapy and recommendations for monitoring.
Rhoden, E. L., & Morgentaler, A. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra022251 · Cited by 705 · see citing works
Effects of Testosterone Replacement in Hypogonadal Men
Snyder, P. J. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.85.8.2670 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Effect of Testosterone Treatment on Bone Mineral Density in Men Over 65 Years of Age
Snyder, P. J. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.84.6.1966 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Dobs, A. S. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.84.10.3469 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Reappraisal of Testosterone’s Binding in Circulation: Physiological and Clinical Implications
Goldman, A. L., Bhasin, S., Wu, F. C. W., Krishna, M., Matsumoto, A. M., & Jasuja, R. (2017) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2017-00025 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Traish, A. M., Goldstein, I., & Kim, N. N. (2007) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.02.034 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Narinx, N., David, K., Walravens, J., Vermeersch, P., Claessens, F., Fiers, T., Lapauw, B., Antonio, L., & Vanderschueren, D. (2022) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-022-04562-1 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lazarou, S., Reyes-Vallejo, L., & Morgentaler, A.
- Affiliations
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Morgentaler, Abraham
- Venue
- The Journal of Sexual Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-11-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1085-1089
- ISSN
- 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-6109
- OpenAlex
- W1502512164
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2024: 14 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
- Keywords
- serum testosterone, reference values, hypogonadism, free testosterone, bioavailable testosterone, free androgen index, equilibrium dialysis, laboratory practice, androgen measurement
- MeSH terms
- Androgens, Biological Assay, Chemistry, Clinical, Humans, Hypogonadism, Laboratories, Male, Reference Standards, Testosterone, United States, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review