Cited by 87Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcarePatient Satisfaction in Healthcare

Patient Empowerment Improved Perioperative Quality of Care in Cancer Patients Aged ≥ 65 Years – A Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Schmidt, Maren, Eckardt, Rahel, Scholtz, Kathrin, Neuner, Bruno, von Dossow-Hanfstingl, Vera, Sehouli, Jalid, Stief, Christian G., Wernecke, Klaus-Dieter +2 more·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

PURPOSE: This randomized controlled, clinical prospective interventional trial was aimed at exploring the effect of patient empowerment on short- and long-term outcomes after major oncologic surgery in elderly cancer patients. METHODS: This trial was performed from February 2011 to January 2014 at two tertiary medical centers in Germany. The study included patients aged 65 years and older undergoing elective surgery for gastro-intestinal, genitourinary, and thoracic cancer. The patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group, i.e. patient empowerment through information booklet and diary keeping, or to the control group, which received standard care. Randomization was done by block randomization in blocks of four in order of enrollment. The primary outcome were 1,postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) and 2. long-term global health-related quality of life (HRQoL) one year postoperatively. HRQoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire. Secondary outcomes encompassed postoperative stress and complications. Further objectives were the identification of predictors of LOS, and HRQoL at 12 months. RESULTS: Overall 652 patients were included. The mean age was 72 ± 4.9 years, and the majority of patients were male (68.6%, n = 447). The ^median of postoperative length of stay was 9 days (IQR 7-14 day). There were no significant differences between the intervention and the control groups in postoperative LOS (p = 0.99) or global HRQoL after one year (women: p = 0.54, men: p = 0.94). While overall complications and major complications occurred in 74% and 24% of the cases, respectively, frequency and severity of complications did not differ significantly between the groups. Patients in the intervention group reported significantly less postoperative pain (p = 0.03) than the control group. Independent predictors for LOS were identified as severity of surgery, length of anesthesia, major postoperative complications, nutritional state, and pre-operative physical functional capacity measured by the Timed Up and Go-test by multiple robust regressions. CONCLUSION: Patient empowerment through information booklet and diary keeping did not shorten the postoperative LOS in elderly onco-surgical patients, but improved quality of care regarding postoperative pain. Postoperative length of stay is influenced by pre-operative nutritional state, pre-operative functional impairment, severity of surgery, and length of anesthesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier NCT01278537.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0137824

Cites

75 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [32]Spies C, Kastrup M, Kerner T, Melzer-Gartzke C, Zielke H, Kox WJ (2013) SOPs in Anästhesiologie und Schmerztherapie Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag. 524 p.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmidt, M., Eckardt, R., Scholtz, K., Neuner, B., von Dossow-Hanfstingl, V., Sehouli, J., Stief, C. G., Wernecke, K.-D., Spies, C. D., & PERATECS Group
Affiliations
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Spies, Claudia D.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-09-17
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
e0137824
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2172688798
Cited by
87
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Universitätsbibliothek der FU Berlin Hochschulschriftenstelle u. Dokumentenserver (cc-by)
Funders
Deutsche Krebshilfe (DKH-108474, 108474)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Keywords
patient empowerment, elderly cancer patients, perioperative care, postoperative hospital stay, health-related quality of life, postoperative pain, postoperative complications, information booklet, diary writing, predictors of length of stay, nutritional status, cancer surgery, gastrointestinal cancer, genitourinary cancer, thoracic tumors, patient education, EORTC QLQ-C30
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms, Germany, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Postoperative Pain, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Participation, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Quality of Health Care, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Thoracic Neoplasms, Urogenital Neoplasms, Treatment Outcome, Perioperative Care, Tertiary Care Centers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review