The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PROJECT A VALIDITY RESULTS: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PREDICTOR AND CRITERION DOMAINS
Abstract
A predictor battery of cognitive ability, perceptual‐psychomotor ability, temperament/personality, interest, and job outcome preference measures was administered to enlisted soldiers in nine Army jobs. These measures were summarized in terms of 24 composite scores. The relationships between the predictor composite scores and five components of job performance were analyzed. Scores from the cognitive and perceptual‐psychomotor ability tests provided the best prediction of job‐specific and general task proficiency, while the temperament/personality composites were the best predictors of giving extra effort, supporting peers, and exhibiting personal discipline. Composite scores derived from the interest inventory were correlated more highly with task proficiency than with demonstrating effort and peer support. In particular, vocational interests were among the best predictors of task proficiency in combat jobs. The results suggest that the Army can improve the prediction of job performance by adding non‐cognitive predictors to its present battery of predictor tests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rating the ratings: Assessing the psychometric quality of rating data.
Saal, F. E., Downey, R. G., & Lahey, M. A. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.88.2.413 · Cited by 566
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb01559.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb01561.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/014662167800200414 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.218 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.71.1.173 · DOI
- 10.1177/001316448304300417 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.87.1.72 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.1.72 · Paper page
- Lord P, 1968, Statistical theory of mental test scores
- Mitchell KJ, 1984, The 1980 youth population norms: Enlisted and occupational classification standards in the Army
- 10.1037/0021-9010.67.2.161 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.2.161
- 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb01558.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.88.2.413 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.2.413 · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb01560.x · DOI
Cited by
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
The structure of phenotypic personality traits.
Goldberg, L. R. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.1.26 · Cited by 4,816
THE CORE SELF‐EVALUATIONS SCALE: DEVELOPMENT OF A MEASURE
JUDGE, T. A., EREZ, A., BONO, J. E., & THORESEN, C. J. (2003) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00152.x · Cited by 2,010
Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life
Gottfredson, L. S. (1997) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0160-2896(97)90014-3 · Cited by 1,408
General Mental Ability in the World of Work: Occupational Attainment and Job Performance.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.162 · Cited by 1,238
Metadata
- Authors
- MCHENRY, J. J., HOUGH, L. M., TOQUAM, J. L., HANSON, M. A., & ASHWORTH, S.
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-06
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 335-354
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W1987891249
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PROJECT A VALIDITY RESULTS: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PREDICTOR AND CRITERION DOMAINS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb01562.x
- The paper
- MCHENRY, J. J., HOUGH, L. M., TOQUAM, J. L., HANSON, M. A., & ASHWORTH, S. (1990). PROJECT A VALIDITY RESULTS: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PREDICTOR AND CRITERION DOMAINS. Personnel Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb01562.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
