Cited by 86Human Resource Development and Performance EvaluationEvaluation and Performance AssessmentVocational Education and Training

FORMATIVE EVALUATION: AN INTEGRATIVE PRACTICE MODEL AND CASE STUDY

BROWN, KENNETH G., GERHARDT, MEGAN W.·2002·Personnel Psychology

Abstract

Training evaluation research and practice has been dominated by a focus on outcomes of completed training programs, or on methods used to assess these outcomes. This focus has largely neglected formative evaluation, which involves evaluating training during design and development. The purpose of this paper is to review existing models of formative evaluation and suggest an integrative practice model that is specifically targeted at improving training delivered in work organizations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00137.x

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BROWN, K. G., & GERHARDT, M. W.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
BROWN, KENNETH G.
Venue
Personnel Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-12
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
951-983
ISSN
  • 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-6570
OpenAlex
W2050082885
Cited by
86
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personnel Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Vocational Education and Training
Keywords
formative assessment, training evaluation, training program design, employee training, training outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review