HIGHER‐ORDER DIMENSIONS OF THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS AND THE BIG SIX VOCATIONAL INTEREST TYPES
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify higher‐order dimensions that explain the relationships among the Big 6 interest types and the Big 5 personality traits. Meta‐analyses were conducted to identify an 11 × 11 true score correlation matrix of interest and personality attributes. Cluster analysis and nonmetric multidimensional scaling were used to identify 3 dimensions that explained relations among the 11 attributes: (a) Interests versus Personality Traits; (b) Striving for Accomplishment Versus Striving for Personal Growth, and (c) Interacting with People Versus Interacting with Things. Overall, results clarified the relationships among interests and personality traits by showing that 3 rather than 2 dimensions best explain the relationships among interests and personality traits.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Persons with high levels of artistic interests typically score higher on the Big Five trait openness (ρ = .41).
“For example, persons with high levels of artistic interests typically score higher on the Big Five trait openness (ρ = .41,Mount et al., 2005) or persons high on enterprising interests score higher on extraversion (ρ = .40).”
From The German O*NET Interest Profiler Short Form (2023) · cites this paper as Mount et al., 2005
We observed moderate to high correlations between artistic interests and openness (r = .55), enterprising interests and extraversion (r = .33), and social interests and extraversion (r = .20).
“As expected from previous meta-analytic findings (Mount et al., 2005), we observed moderate to high correlations between artistic interests and openness (r = .55),enterprising interests and extraversion (r = .33),and social interests and extraversion (r = .20).”
From The German O*NET Interest Profiler Short Form (2023) · cites this paper as Mount et al., 2005
Vocational interests and personality traits describe distinct aspects of human individuality.
“It is important to note, however, that although vocational interests and personality traits might share similar psychological processes (Hoff, Song, Einarsdóttir, et al., 2020;Mount et al., 2005), the two phenomena describe distinct aspects of human individuality (see also Roemer et al., 2023).”
From The German O*NET Interest Profiler Short Form (2023) · cites this paper as Mount et al., 2005
Social interests also correlated moderately with conscientiousness (r = .15), which was not the case in the original version (r = À.04) or in the meta-analysis (ρ = .07).
“Somewhat deviating from the previous results, social interests also correlated moderately with conscientiousness (r = .15),which was not the case in the original version (r = À.04;Rounds et al., 2021) or in the meta-analysis (ρ = .07,Mount et al., 2005).”
From The German O*NET Interest Profiler Short Form (2023) · cites this paper as Mount et al., 2005
Correlations between the interest scores and personality trait scores converged with previous findings, suggesting that the scores of the German O*NET IP were adequately located in the nomological network of vocational interests.
“Also, correlations between the interest scores and personality trait scores converged with previous findings (Mount et al., 2005;Rounds et al., 2021), suggesting that the scores of the German O*NET IP were adequately located in the nomological network of vocational interests.”
From The German O*NET Interest Profiler Short Form (2023) · cites this paper as Mount et al., 2005
In both samples, the highest correlation occurred for realistic and conventional interests (r ≥ .54).
“In both samples, the highest correlation occurred for realistic and conventional interests (r ≥ .54),which indicates a stronger relation than reported in meta-analysis (ρ = .27;Mount et al., 2005) or in prior results based on the O*NET IP (e.g., r = .22 in the validation sample; Rounds et al., 2021).”
From The German O*NET Interest Profiler Short Form (2023) · cites this paper as Mount et al., 2005
Specific links between vocational interests and Big Five personality traits have long been established.
“Specific links with Big Five personality traits (Mount et al., 2005) have long been established.”
From The German O*NET Interest Profiler Short Form (2023) · cites this paper as Mount et al., 2005
Persons high on enterprising interests score higher on extraversion (ρ = .40).
“For example, persons with high levels of artistic interests typically score higher on the Big Five trait openness (ρ = .41,Mount et al., 2005) or persons high on enterprising interests score higher on extraversion (ρ = .40).”
From The German O*NET Interest Profiler Short Form (2023) · cites this paper as Mount et al., 2005
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 63 · Cited by 463
- Authors
- MOUNT, M. K., BARRICK, M. R., SCULLEN, S. M., & ROUNDS, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- MOUNT, MICHAEL K.
- ORCID
- ROUNDS, JAMES
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-05-09
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 447-478
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W2133979121
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 14.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personnel Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- Big Five personality traits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review