The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The ‘missing’ young stellar objects in the central parsec of the Galaxy: evidence for star formation in a massive accretion disc and a top-heavy initial mass function
Open accessAbstract
A few dozen young high-mass stars orbit Sgr A* at distances as short as ∼0.1 pc, where star formation should be quenched by the strong tidal shear from Sgr A*. The puzzling young stellar population is believed to come into existence in one of two ways: (i) ‘normal’ star formation at several tens of parsecs in a very massive star cluster that then spiralled in; or (ii) star formation in situ in a massive self-gravitating disc. We propose to constrain these two scenarios via the expected X-ray emission from young low-mass stars that should have formed alongside the massive stars. To this end we compare the recent Chandra observations of X-ray emission from young stars in the Orion nebula, and the Chandra observations of the Sgr A* field. We show that the cluster spiral-in model is ruled out irrespectively of the initial mass function (IMF) of the young stars. In addition, for the in situ model, we find that no more than a few thousand low-mass stars could have formed alongside the massive stars. This is more than a factor of 10 fewer than expected if these stars were formed with the standard IMF as elsewhere in the Galaxy. The young stars in the Galactic Centre are thus the first solid observational evidence for star formation in active galactic nucleus (AGN) discs and also require the IMF of these stars to be top-heavy. We briefly consider the implications of these results for AGN in general.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A star in a 15.2-year orbit around the supermassive black hole at the centre of the Milky Way
Schödel, R., Ott, T., Genzel, R., Hofmann, R., Lehnert, M., Eckart, A., Mouawad, N., Alexander, T., Reid, M. J., Lenzen, R., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01121 · Cited by 1,166 · cited 1×
“Sgr A∗ is the closest super-massive black hole (SMBH), naturally residing in the centre of our Galaxy (e.g., Schödel et al., 2002; Ghez et al., 2003), and weighing about MBH ∼ 3.5× 106 M⊙.”
BackgroundInfluentialGhez, A. M., Duchêne, G., Matthews, K., Hornstein, S. D., Tanner, A., Larkin, J., Morris, M., Becklin, E. E., Salim, S., Kremenek, T., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/374804 · Cited by 717
Stellar Disk in the Galactic Center: A Remnant of a Dense Accretion Disk?
Levin, Y., & Beloborodov, A. M. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/376675 · Cited by 414 · cited 6×
“Several authors have previously suggested (e.g., Morris, 1993; Krabbe et al., 1995; Levin & Beloborodov, 2003) that due to the extreme environment near the SMBH in our Galactic Centre, formation of low mass stars may be much less efficient than elsewhere in the Galaxy.”
BackgroundInfluentialDiffuse X‐Ray Emission in a Deep Chandra Image of the Galactic Center
Muno, M. P., Baganoff, F. K., Bautz, M. W., Feigelson, E. D., Garmire, G. P., Morris, M. R., Park, S., Ricker, G. R., & Townsley, L. K. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/422865 · Cited by 221 · cited 4×
“Since Sgr A∗ region is rather dim in X-rays (Baganoff et al., 2003; Muno et al., 2003, 2004), we were able to place an upper limit of ∼ few thousand of low mass PMS stars populating the same region as the He-I stars of the better defined stellar ring (Levin & Beloborodov, 2003; Genzel et al., 2003;…”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
The Galactic Center massive black hole and nuclear star cluster
Genzel, R., Eisenhauer, F., & Gillessen, S. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.3121 · Cited by 1,236
Dusty star-forming galaxies at high redshift
Casey, C. M., Narayanan, D., & Cooray, A. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.009 · Cited by 800
The Two Young Star Disks in the Central Parsec of the Galaxy: Properties, Dynamics, and Formation
Paumard, T., Genzel, R., Martins, F., Nayakshin, S., Beloborodov, A. M., Levin, Y., Trippe, S., Eisenhauer, F., Ott, T., Gillessen, S., et al. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/503273 · Cited by 690
Self-citationGravitational waves from scattering of stellar-mass black holes in galactic nuclei
O'Leary, R. M., Kocsis, B., & Loeb, A. (2009) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14653.x · Cited by 506
Ciotti, L., & Ostriker, J. P. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/519833 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Nayakshin, S., & Sunyaev, R.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-11-01
- Volume
- 364
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- L23-L27
- ISSN
- 1745-3925 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-3933
- OpenAlex
- W2019594817
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ‘missing’ young stellar objects in the central parsec of the Galaxy: evidence for star formation in a massive accretion disc and a top-heavy initial mass function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00097.x
- The paper
- Nayakshin, S., & Sunyaev, R. (2005). The ‘missing’ young stellar objects in the central parsec of the Galaxy: evidence for star formation in a massive accretion disc and a top-heavy initial mass function. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00097.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.