The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences
Abstract
For many researchers, the Rasch model provides a very practical solution to data analysis in the social sciences. This volume contends that Rasch measurement is the model of choice because it is the closest to realizing the sort of objective fundamental measurement so long revered in the physical sciences. Trevor Bond has worked with leading Rasch theoreticians for more than 15 years, advising developmentalists and teachers on how to conduct and interpret Rasch analyses of their own data. After each of his many research presentations, Dr. Bond was asked to recommend a suitable text for those who wish to learn more about Rasch analysis. Unfortunately, the books published to date require a significant knowledge of statistics and not easily accessible to many practicing researchers. This lack of a suitable introductory text is the driving force behind this book. The goals of this authored volume are: * to present an accessible overview of the basic properties and principles of Rasch analysis, that does not require a sophisticated statistical background, * to demonstrate how Rasch analysis can be applied to a number of generic problems encountered by psychologists and educators, and * to prepare readers for performing their own analyses and interpreting the results. This book is ideal for all researchers in the human sciences interested in learning how to actually implement the Rasch model with their own data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hibbard, J. H., Stockard, J., Mahoney, E. R., & Tusler, M. (2004) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00269.x · Cited by 2,748
Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks.
Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2004) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00691.x · Cited by 1,980
Development and validation of a revised short version of the working alliance inventory
Hatcher, R. L., & Gillaspy, J. A. (2006) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503300500352500 · Cited by 1,355
Using psychometric techniques to improve the Balance Evaluation Systems Test: the mini-BESTest
Franchignoni, F., Horak, F., Godi, M., Nardone, A., & Giordano, A. (2010) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/16501977-0537 · Cited by 1,081
Ravens-Sieberer, U., Gosch, A., Rajmil, L., Erhart, M., Bruil, J., Power, M., Duer, W., Auquier, P., Cloetta, B., Czemy, L., et al. (2008) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00291.x · Cited by 807
Metadata
- Authors
- Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Measurement
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 185-187
- ISSN
- 0022-0655 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-3984
- OpenAlex
- W1995617856
- Cited by
- 4,492
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 140.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2003.tb01103.x
- The paper
- Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2003). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Journal of Educational Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2003.tb01103.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.