Cited by 807Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifePsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The KIDSCREEN-52 quality of life measure for children and adolescents: Psychometric results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 European countries

Open access
Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike, Gosch, Angela, Rajmil, Luis, Erhart, Michael, Bruil, Jeanet, Power, Mick, Duer, Wolfgang, Auquier, Pascal +7 more·2008·Value in Health

Abstract

Objective This study assesses the reliability and validity of the European KIDSCREEN-52 generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire for children and adolescents.Research design The KIDSCREEN-52, which measures HRQoL in 10 dimensions, was administered to a representative sample of 22,827 children and adolescents (8 to 18 years) in 13 European countries. Psychometric properties were assessed using the Classical Test Theory approach, Rasch analysis, and structural equation modeling (SEM). A priori expected associations between KIDSCREEN scales and sociodemographic and health-related factors were examined. Test-retest reliability was assessed in 10 countries.Results For the overall sample, Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.77 to 0.89. Scaling success (Multitrait Analysis Program) was >97.8% for all dimensions and Rasch analysis item fit (INFITmsq) ranged from 0.80 to 1.27. The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.56 to 0.77. No sizeable differential item functioning (DIF) was found by age, sex or health status. Four items showed DIF across countries. The specified SEM fitted the data well (root mean square error of approximation: 0.06, comparative fit index: 0.98). Correlation coefficients between Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, Child Health and Illness Profile-Adolescent Edition, and Youth Quality of Life Instrument scales and KIDSCREEN dimensions assessing similar constructs were moderate for those (r = 0.44 to 0.61). Statistically significant differences between children with and without physical and mental health problems (Children with Special Health Care Needs screener: d = 0.17 to 0.42, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: d = 0.32 to 0.72) were found in all dimensions. All dimensions showed a gradient according to socioeconomic status.Conclusions The KIDSCREEN-52 questionnaire has acceptable levels of reliability and validity. Further work is needed to assess longitudinal validity and sensitivity to change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00291.x

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ravens-Sieberer, U., Gosch, A., Rajmil, L., Erhart, M., Bruil, J., Power, M., Duer, W., Auquier, P., Cloetta, B., Czemy, L., Mazur, J., Czimbalmos, A., Tountas, Y., Hagquist, C., & Kilroe, J.
Affiliations
  • Munich University of Applied Sciences (DE)
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
  • Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
  • Royal Edinburgh Hospital (GB)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille (FR)
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (CZ)
  • Instytut Matki i Dziecka (PL)
  • Karlstad University (SE)
Venue
Value in Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
645-658
ISSN
1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047032381
Cited by
807
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 40
FWCI
59.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Value in Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
KIDSCREEN-52, health-related quality of life, children and adolescents, psychometric validation, cross-cultural validation, Rasch analysis, test-retest reliability, differential item functioning, socioeconomic status, children with special health care needs, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, PedsQL, European children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Welfare, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Europe, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, Reproducibility of Results, Logistic Models, Cultural Diversity, Internationality, Cultural Competency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review