QUANTIFICATION OF FLUX DECLINE AND DESIGN OF ULTRAFILTRATION SYSTEM FOR CLARIFICATION OF TENDER COCONUT WATER
Abstract
Clarification of tender coconut water was carried out in a continuous stirred ultrafiltration cell at transmembrane pressures of 276, 414, 552 and 690 kPa and at stirrer speeds of 800 (Reynolds number [Re] = 0.93 × 10 5), 1,000 (Re = 1.17 × 10 5), 1,400 (Re = 1.63 × 10 5) and 1,600 (Re = 1.87 × 10 5) rpm, for each pressure. Permeate flux decline was analyzed using a first‐order kinetic model for the development of the polarized layer resistance. Correlations were proposed for the steady‐state polarized layer resistance with the operating conditions, e.g., transmembrane pressure difference, Reynolds number and membrane resistance. Decrease in membrane permeability after subsequent experiments was also quantified. Average irreversible fouling resistance was estimated as 7.5 × 10 12 m−1. Using the developed design equations of the stirred continuous ultrafiltration system, finally, the performance of such system in terms of productivity as function of operating conditions, membrane area and number of cleaning cycles was also evaluated. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: The application of membrane technology is one of the emerging areas in the food industry. The major application includes fruit juice clarification and concentration. Because of the nonthermal nature of membrane separation, the juice can be clarified at room temperature and packed aseptically for longer shelf life without the loss of its initial quality parameters. The major problem during clarification is decline in permeate flux of fruit juice with time. Identification of the reasons for flux decline is essential for designing membrane modules to make the clarification process commercially viable. The quality of juice during storage is vital, so the determination of the variation of its physicochemical properties during storage is also important. The present study helps in designing membrane modules for the production of clarified tender coconut water.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ultrafiltration retains PPO and POD enzymes.
“Ultrafiltration retains PPO and POD enzymes.”
From Coconut water preservation and processing: a review (2012) · cites this paper as [66]
Retention percentages of protein for 100, 50, and 20 kDa cut-off ultrafiltration membranes were 25, 38, and 43%, respectively.
“Retention percentages of protein of, respectively, (25, 38 and 43)% for the (100, 50 and 20) kDa cut-off membranes were confirmed [66,75].”
From Coconut water preservation and processing: a review (2012) · cites this paper as [66]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Coconut water preservation and processing: a review
Prades, A., Dornier, M., Diop, N., & Pain, J.-P. (2012) · Fruits · doi:10.1051/fruits/2012009 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Chemical composition of thermally processed coconut water evaluated by GC–MS, UPLC-HRMS, and NMR
Cunha, A. G., Alves Filho, E. G., Silva, L. M. A., Ribeiro, P. R. V., Rodrigues, T. H. S., Brito, E. S. D., & Miranda, M. R. A. D. (2020) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126874 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Mahnot, N. K., Kalita, D., Mahanta, C. L., & Chaudhuri, M. K. (2014) · LWT - Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2014.06.040 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Synergistic effect of thermosonication to reduce enzymatic activity in coconut water
Ribeiro, M. D. M., Valdramidis, V. P., Nunes, C. A., & de Souza, V. R. (2017) · Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2017.04.013 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Non-Thermal processing of tender coconut water—A review
Rajashri, K., Rastogi, N. K., & Negi, P. S. (2022) · Food Reviews International · doi:10.1080/87559129.2020.1847142 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- JAYANTI, V. K., RAI, P., DASGUPTA, S., & DE, S.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN)
- Birsa Agricultural University (IN)
- Venue
- Journal of Food Process Engineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01-25
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 128-143
- ISSN
- 0145-8876 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-4530
- OpenAlex
- W1964643046
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Food Process Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Membrane Separation Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Coconut Research and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
- Keywords
- tender coconut water, ultrafiltration, permeate flux decline, first-order kinetic model, transmembrane pressure, stirring speed, Reynolds number, membrane permeability, juice clarification, membrane module design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review