The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE ROLE OF AUDITORY CUES IN MODULATING THE PERCEIVED CRISPNESS AND STALENESS OF POTATO CHIPS
Abstract
ABSTRACT We investigated whether the perception of the crispness and staleness of potato chips can be affected by modifying the sounds produced during the biting action. Participants in our study bit into potato chips with their front teeth while rating either their crispness or freshness using a computer‐based visual analog scale. The results demonstrate that the perception of both the crispness and staleness was systematically altered by varying the loudness and/or frequency composition of the auditory feedback elicited during the biting action. The potato chips were perceived as being both crisper and fresher when either the overall sound level was increased, or when just the high frequency sounds (in the range of 2 kHz−20 kHz) were selectively amplified. These results highlight the significant role that auditory cues can play in modulating the perception and evaluation of foodstuffs (despite the fact that consumers are often unaware of the influence of such auditory cues). The paradigm reported here also provides a novel empiric methodology for assessing such multisensory contributions to food perception.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The sounds of mastication (i.e., the sounds that we hear when eating) can contribute to our perception of crispness, freshness and pleasantness for foods such as crisps, biscuits and fruit [70-73]”
From The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Sensory Factors in Sweetness Perception of Food and Beverages: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as [72]
Citations
Cites
Norman, D. A. (2016) · Vahlen eBooks · doi:10.15358/9783800648108 · Cited by 6,415
Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion
Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415429a · Cited by 4,844
Neisser, U. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,502
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-5559 · Cited by 2,342
Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food
Amerine, M. A., Pangborn, R. M., & Roessler, E. B. (1965) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-08103-0 · Cited by 2,038
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-4365 · Cited by 1,897
Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy.
Welch, R. B., & Warren, D. H. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.638 · Cited by 1,176
What in the World Do We Hear?: An Ecological Approach to Auditory Event Perception
Gaver, W. W. (1993) · Ecological Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15326969eco0501_1 · Cited by 903
Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: plasticity and interactions
Shimojo, S. (2001) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00241-5 · Cited by 607
Food structure : its creation and evaluation
Blanshard, J. M. V., & Mitchell, J. R. (1988) · Cited by 496
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- BRENNAN J.G., 1974, Sensory and instrumental measurements of “brittleness” and “crispness” in biscuits, Proceedings 4th Intern. Congress Food Sci. Technol., 2, 130
- DACREMONT C., 1993, Effect of visual clues on evaluation of bite sounds of foodstuffs, Sci. Aliment., 13, 603
- DRAKE B.K.1970.Relationships of sounds and other vibrations to food acceptability.Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress of Food Science and Technology pp.437–445 9–14 August Washington DC.
- FOSTER D., 1956, Psychological Aspects of Food Colors from the Consumer's Standpoint
- MISKIEWICZ A., 1999, Psychoacoustics in the automotive industry, Acustica, 85, 646
- MOSKOWITZ H.R.andKAPSALIS J.G.1974.Psychophysical relations in texture. Paper presented at the Symposium on Advances in Food Texture August 28–30. Guelph Ontario.
- SPENCE C., 2002, The ICI Report on the Secret of the Senses
- VICKERS Z.M., 1977, What sounds good for lunch?, Cereal Foods World, 22, 246
- VICKERS Z.M., 1987, Food Texture: Instrumental and Sensory Measurement, 45
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The multisensory perception of flavor
Auvray, M., & Spence, C. (2008) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.06.005 · Cited by 685
Self-citationMultisensory Flavor Perception
Spence, C. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.007 · Cited by 579
Self-citationThe consumer psychology of brands
Schmitt, B. H. (2011) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.09.005 · Cited by 565
Digital Sensory Marketing: Integrating New Technologies into Multisensory Online Experience
Petit, O., Velasco, C., & Spence, C. J. (2018) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2018.07.004 · Cited by 587
Self-citationFlavor network and the principles of food pairing
Ahn, Y., Ahnert, S. E., Bagrow, J. P., & Barabási, A.-Ĺ. (2011) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00196 · Cited by 497
Metadata
- Authors
- ZAMPINI, M., & SPENCE, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- ZAMPINI, MASSIMILIANO
- SPENCE, CHARLES
- Venue
- Journal of Sensory Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 347-363
- ISSN
- 0887-8250 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-459X
- OpenAlex
- W2013326389
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 4.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Sensory Studies (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- auditory cues, potato chips, auditory feedback, high-frequency sound, food freshness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
