Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 419

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

IDENTIFICATION OF STIMULI CONTROLLING THE SENSORY EVALUATION OF VISCOSITY II. Oral Methods

SHAMA, F., SHERMAN, P.·1973·Journal of Texture Studies

Abstract

The stimulus associated with oral evaluation of the viscosity of liquid and viscous foods appears to embrace a range of shear rates extending from 10‐1 to 1000 s‐1. The value associated with a particular food depends on its flow characteristics. For liquid foods the stimulus appears to be the shear rate developed at an approximately constant shear stress (∼ 100 dyn cm‐2), whereas for viscous foods it appears to be the shear stress developed at an approximately constant shear rate (∼ 10 s‐1). Additional factors may be involved when evaluating highly viscous non‐Newtonian foods or foods with an oil continuous medium. These are ‘plug flow’ or the spreading coefficient, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-4603.1973.tb00657.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 419

Metadata

Authors
SHAMA, F., & SHERMAN, P.
Venue
Journal of Texture Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1973-04
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
111-118
ISSN
  • 0022-4901 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-4603
OpenAlex
W2165935671
Cited by
419
References
0
FWCI
16.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IDENTIFICATION OF STIMULI CONTROLLING THE SENSORY EVALUATION OF VISCOSITY II. Oral Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-4603.1973.tb00657.x
The paper
SHAMA, F., & SHERMAN, P. (1973). IDENTIFICATION OF STIMULI CONTROLLING THE SENSORY EVALUATION OF VISCOSITY II. Oral Methods. Journal of Texture Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4603.1973.tb00657.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.