Cited by 138Biochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesSensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsTactile and Sensory Interactions

Effects of solution viscosity on perceived saltiness and sweetness

Open access
Christensen, Carol M.·1980·Perception & Psychophysics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03204394

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased viscosity can reduce taste perception in sweet and salty solutions.

    “Christensen [124] first suggested that increased viscosity can reduce taste perception in sweet and salty solutions.”

    From The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Sensory Factors in Sweetness Perception of Food and Beverages: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as [124]

    The opening section reports reduced perceived sweetness and saltiness in some CMC-thickened solutions. But the General Discussion says viscosity per se did not reduce taste intensity; the reductions depended on the thickener and occurred chiefly in weak-tasting solutions. The paper also describes earlier studies reporting such reductions, so it does not support calling Christensen the first to suggest them. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. ENGI-:N, T. Psychophysics: II. Scaling methods. In J. W. Kling & L. S. Riggs (Eds.), Woodworth and Schlosberg's Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1971.
  2. STEVENS, S. S. In G. Stevens (Ed.), Psychophysics. New York: Wiley, 1975.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christensen, C. M.
Affiliations
Monell Chemical Senses Center (US)
Corresponding author
Christensen, Carol M.
Venue
Perception & Psychophysics
Published
1980-07
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
347-353
ISSN
  • 0031-5117 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5962
OpenAlex
W2045778000
Cited by
138
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perception & Psychophysics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Monell Chemical Senses Center
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
solution viscosity, perceived sweetness, carboxymethyl cellulose, taste intensity, sodium chloride, sucrose, taste perception, magnitude estimation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Humans, Psychophysics, Taste, Viscosity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review