The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Agency Theory Investigation of Supply Risk M anagement
Abstract
SUMMARY: Managing supply risk is an essential element of the overall supply management task. As the complexity of risk management has increased, responsiveness seems dominated by varying the level of inventory and using multiple supply sources as means of creating buffers. This research uses the framework of agency theory in managing supplier behaviors as a means to reduce supply risk and the impact of detrimental events. Empirical results indicate that purchasing organizations address various sources of supply risk by implementing management techniques that reduce the likelihood that detrimental events will occur. Firm size, purchases as a percentage of sales, and industry characteristics were also found to influence the manner in which supplier behaviors are managed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 · Cited by 13,338
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Cited by
Wilhelm, M. M., Blome, C., Bhakoo, V., & Paulraj, A. (2016) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2015.11.001 · Cited by 539
The impact of transportation disruptions on supply chain performance
Wilson, M. C. (2007) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2005.09.008 · Cited by 490
BUYER–SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS: DERIVED VALUE OVER TWO DECADES
TERPEND, R., TYLER, B. B., KRAUSE, D. R., & HANDFIELD, R. B. (2008) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2008.00053.x · Cited by 300
The role of artificial intelligence in the procurement process: State of the art and research agenda
Guida, M., Caniato, F., Moretto, A., & Ronchi, S. (2023) · Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management · doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2023.100823 · Cited by 144
Havinga, F., Mahdad, M., & Dolfsma, W. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137455 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Zsidisin, G. A., & Ellram, L. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Supply Chain Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 15-27
- ISSN
- 1055-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-2409
- 1745-493X
- OpenAlex
- W1984363334
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Agency Theory Investigation of Supply Risk M anagement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-493x.2003.tb00156.x
- The paper
- Zsidisin, G. A., & Ellram, L. M. (2003). An Agency Theory Investigation of Supply Risk M anagement. Journal of Supply Chain Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493x.2003.tb00156.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
