Cited by 50Medication Adherence and ComplianceMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Medication adherence among homeless patients: A pilot study of cell phone effectiveness

Burda, Charon, Haack, Mary, Duarte, Ana C., Alemi, Farrokh·2012·Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners

Abstract

Purpose: We examined the feasibility of using cell phones to monitor medication adherence among homeless participants and collected data for research purposes. Data sources: Ten homeless individuals with a co‐occurring substance use and psychiatric disorders who were receiving psychopharmacologic treatment participated in the study. All psychopharmacologic treatment was provided by a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner. Cell phones were provided to participants with unlimited phone service for 45 days. An automated telephone system was programmed to call participants daily for 30 days. All participant responses were reported to a computer and reviewed by study staff on a daily basis. Conclusions: The automated calls reached study participants 93% of days and, when reached, participants reported 100% adherence with the prescribed medication regimen. Exit interviews indicated strong support for the usefulness of the phone and the value of the call and survey as reminders to take their medication. No patients dropped out of this study. Implications for practice: This pilot study establishes the feasibility of using cell phones to monitor and manage medication regimens for hard‐to‐reach populations, such as the homeless with co‐occurring disorders. It also establishes that this technology would work for research data collection. Disclaimer The views expressed in this article do not represent the views of the Veterans Administration or the United States Government.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00756.x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burda, C., Haack, M., Duarte, A. C., & Alemi, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Bay Pines VA Healthcare System (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06-26
Volume
24
Issue
11
Pages
675-681
ISSN
  • 1041-2972 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-7599
OpenAlex
W2113798989
Cited by
50
References
31
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Diabetes Research Institute Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
medication adherence, homelessness, mobile devices, psychopharmacologic treatment, psychiatric nurse practitioners, hard-to-reach populations, feasibility, research data collection
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Drug Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Female, Ill-Housed Persons, Humans, Male, Maryland, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Reminder Systems, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Substance-Related Disorders, Cell Phone, Medication Adherence, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review