The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SCHOOL BONDING, RACE, AND DELINQUENCY*
Abstract
While there is considerable evidence that blacks experience school in qualitatively distinct ways from whites, there has been a general failure to examine racial variation in the impact of school variables on juvenile misconduct. The purpose of this research is to describe the manner in which school bonding affects delinquent conduct, focusing in particular on the role of the school in the delinquent involvement of black youths. Our orientation is primarily a control theory one that suggests that the greater the degree of school bonding the lesser the likelihood of involvement in delinquent activities. Our review of the literature leads us to expect differential levels of bonding by race and across varying racial environments of schools, with resulting differential effects on delinquency. On the basis of a neighborhood sample of 942 adolescents, we identijj seven distinct dimensions of school bonding. The analysis reveals that blacks are at least as strongly bonded to the school as whites, that our model explains comparable amounts of variance in delinquency across race‐sex subgroups, and that the racial composition of the school is generally unimportant in conditioning the effect of school bonding on delinquency. While our findings are generally supportive of control theory, a model that purports to be invariant across race, gender, and socioeconomic boundaries, we caution that such a conclusion may be both premature and mistaken. We discuss the implications of these findings and suggest that they be interpreted within a framework that also considers family and peer bonding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Merton, R. K. (2017) · Gangs · doi:10.4324/9781351157803-1 · Cited by 3,694
Black students' school success: Coping with the ?burden of ?acting white??
Fordham, S., & Ogbu, J. U. (1986) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf01112192 · Cited by 3,323
Follow-up of the later careers and lives of 1,000 boys who dropped out of high school.
Hathaway, S. R., Reynolds, P. C., & Monachesi, E. D. (1969) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027613 · Cited by 32
Cited by
Toward an Understanding of Definitions and Measures of School Engagement and Related Terms
Jimerson, S. R., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003) · The California School Psychologist · doi:10.1007/bf03340893 · Cited by 811
Henry, K. L., Knight, K. E., & Thornberry, T. P. (2012) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-011-9665-3 · Cited by 626
Social Influences on Cyberbullying Behaviors Among Middle and High School Students
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2013) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9902-4 · Cited by 414
Crosnoe, R., Cavanagh, S., & Elder, G. H. (2003) · Sociological Perspectives · doi:10.1525/sop.2003.46.3.331 · Cited by 379
School Bonding in Children and Adolescents: Conceptualization, Assessment, and Associated Variables
Maddox, S. J., & Prinz, R. J. (2003) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1023/a:1022214022478 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- CERNKOVICH, S. A., & GIORDANO, P. C.
- Venue
- Criminology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 261-291
- ISSN
- 0011-1384 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-9125
- OpenAlex
- W2030926643
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SCHOOL BONDING, RACE, AND DELINQUENCY*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01105.x
- The paper
- CERNKOVICH, S. A., & GIORDANO, P. C. (1992). SCHOOL BONDING, RACE, AND DELINQUENCY*. Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01105.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.