Cited by 3,690Crime, Deviance, and Social ControlEmile Durkheim and SociologyCrime Patterns and Interventions

Social Structure and Anomie

Merton, Robert K.·2017·Gangs

Abstract

This chapter suggests that certain phases of social structure generate the circumstances in which infringement of social codes constitutes a "normal" response. Whatever the sentiments of the writer or reader concerning the ethical desirability of coordinating the means-and-goals phases of the social structure, one must agree that lack of such coordination leads to anomie. The American stress on pecuniary success and ambitiousness for all thus invites exaggerated anxieties, hostilities, neuroses and antisocial behavior. "The-end-justifies-the-means" doctrine becomes a guiding tenet for action when the cultural structure unduly exalts the end and the social organization unduly limits possible recourse to approved means. The lack of high integration between the means and-end elements of the cultural pattern and the particular class structure combine to favor a heightened frequency of antisocial conduct in such groups. A stable social structure demands a balanced distribution of affect among its various segments.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Merton argues that deviant behavior is not primarily the product of biologically derived impulses breaking through social control, but a "normal" response generated by certain phases of social structure. Anomie arises when a culture disproportionately emphasizes success-goals while the institutionalized means for attaining them are unequally distributed.

Key findings

  • Social structure has two analytically separable elements — culturally defined goals and the institutionalized norms regulating acceptable means — and these vary independently; the limiting case of goal-emphasis is one where "the range of alternative procedures is limited only by technical rather than institutional considerations."
  • Five logically possible modes of individual adaptation are derived from acceptance/rejection of goals and means: Conformity (+/+), Innovation (+/−), Ritualism (−/+), Retreatism (−/−), and Rebellion (±/±). Conformity is "the most common and widely diffused"; Retreatism is the least common.
  • Innovation (e.g., crime, vice) occurs when the cultural emphasis on success is assimilated without equally internalizing the norms governing means — illustrated by Lohman's analysis of vice in Chicago's near north side, where conventional occupational opportunities were "almost completely limited to manual labor."
  • Poverty alone does not produce high crime rates: "Only insofar as poverty and associated disadvantages in competition for the culture values approved for all members of the society is linked with the assimilation of a cultural emphasis on monetary accumulation as a symbol of success is antisocial conduct a 'normal' outcome." Hence poverty is less correlated with crime in southeastern Europe than in the United States.

Methods

  • Theoretical/conceptual essay, not an empirical study. It constructs an analytical scheme of interdependent variables (culture goals, institutional norms, class structure) and derives ideal types of social orders and modes of adaptation.
  • Evidence is illustrative and drawn from secondary sources: Lohman's participant-observer study of Chicago vice areas, the Lynds' *Middletown in Transition*, Taussig and Joslyn on business leaders, and comparative observations on crime and poverty in the U.S. versus southeastern Europe.
  • Analysis proceeds by logical derivation of the five adaptations and by reasoning about which structural conditions (differential access to legitimate means plus shared success-symbols) predispose toward each.

Limitations

  • Stated by the paper: the treatment is "brief" and "incomplete" — it does not exhaustively treat structural elements predisposing toward one response over another; it neglects (without denying) factors determining the specific incidence of responses; it omits consideration of the social functions of illicit responses; it has not tested the scheme's explanatory power against a large number of group variations; it has not adequately dealt with rebellious conduct seeking radical refashioning of the social framework; and it has not examined cultural conflict in culture-goal/institutional-means malintegration.
  • Evident from the text: the argument is programmatic and unaccompanied by original data or statistical tests; the empirical support is borrowed from other studies and from comparative assertions that are not systematically documented. The paper also explicitly abstracts from biological and personality factors, so it cannot account for individual-level incidence.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781351157803-1

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 3 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Interpretationreasoning
    § ROBeRt K. MeRtoN Harvard University · p. 5

    Poverty as such, and consequent limitation of opportunity, are not sufficient to induce a conspicuously high rate of criminal behavior.

    “Poverty as such, and consequent limitation of opportunity, are not sufficient to induce a conspicuously high rate of criminal behavior.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationreasoning
    § ROBeRt K. MeRtoN Harvard University · p. 1

    The emphasis upon certain goals may vary independently of the degree of emphasis upon institutional means.

    “The emphasis upon certain goals may vary independently of the degree of emphasis upon institutional means.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Premisecitation
    § ROBeRt K. MeRtoN Harvard University · p. 4

    Lohman has shown that specialized areas of vice in the near north side of Chicago constitute a 'normal' response to a situation where the cultural emphasis upon pecuniary success has been absorbed, but where there is little access to conventional and legitimate means for attaining such success.

    “Lohman has shown that specialized areas of vice in the near north side of Chicago constitute a “normal” response to a situation where the cultural emphasis upon pecuniary success has been absorbed, but where there is little access to conventional and legitimate means for attaining such success.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lohman

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Interpretationreasoning
    § ROBeRt K. MeRtoN Harvard University · p. 2

    Certain aspects of the social structure may generate countermores and antisocial behavior precisely because of differential emphases on goals and regulations.

    “As we shall see, certain aspects of the social structure may generate countermores and antisocial behavior precisely because of differential emphases on goals and regulations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationreasoning
    § ROBeRt K. MeRtoN Harvard University · p. 4

    The lack of high integration between means-end elements and the particular class structure combine to favor a heightened frequency of antisocial conduct in such groups.

    “The lack of high integration between the meansand-end elements of the cultural pattern and the particular class structure combine to favor a heightened frequency of antisocial conduct in such groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 8
  • May combine two claims. 5
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ROBeRt K. MeRtoN Harvard University · p. 4

    Rebellion occurs when emancipation from reigning standards, due to frustration or marginalist perspectives, leads to the attempt to introduce a new social order.

    “rebellion occurs when emancipation from the reigning standards, due to frustration or to marginalist perspectives, leads to the attempt to introduce a “new social order.””
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ROBeRt K. MeRtoN Harvard University · p. 6

    At the extreme, predictability virtually disappears and cultural chaos or anomie intervenes.

    “At the extreme, predictability virtually disappears and what; may be properly termed cultural chaos or anomie intervenes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ROBeRt K. MeRtoN Harvard University · p. 4

    Where frustration derives from inaccessibility of effective institutional means for attaining highly valued success, innovation, ritualism and rebellion are also possible; the result is determined by the particular personality and cultural background.

    “Be it noted that where frustration derives from the inaccessibility of effective institutional means for attaining economic or any other type of highly valued “success,” that Adaptations II, III and V (innovation, ritualism and rebellion)'are also possible. The result will be determined by the particular personality, and thus, the particular cultural background, involved.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § ROBeRt K. MeRtoN Harvard University · p. 1

    Every social group couples its scale of desired ends with moral or institutional regulation of permissible and required procedures for attaining these ends.

    “Every social group invariably couples its scale of desired ends with moral or institutional regulation of permissible and required procedures for attaining these ends.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ROBeRt K. MeRtoN Harvard University · p. 2

    In the extreme case, institutional norms may be so vitiated by goal-emphasis that the range of behavior is limited only by considerations of technical expediency, and anomie ensues.

    “In the extreme case, the latter may be so vitiated by the goal-emphasis that the range of behavior is limited only by considerations of technical expediency.”
    • Also stated in: § ROBeRt K. MeRtoN Harvard University · p. 2 · plain
      “As this process continues, the integration of the society becomes tenuous and anomie ensues.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given
    § ROBeRt K. MeRtoN Harvard University · p. 1

    A second polar type is found in groups where activities originally conceived as instrumental are transmuted into ends in themselves, with ritualistic adherence to institutionally prescribed conduct becoming virtually obsessive.

    “A second polar type is found in groups where activities originally conceived as instrumental are transmuted into ends in themselves. The original purposes are forgotten and ritualistic adherence to institutionally prescribed conduct becomes virtually obsessive.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ROBeRt K. MeRtoN Harvard University · p. 4

    The consequences of structural inconsistency are psychopathological personality, and/or antisocial conduct, and/or revolutionary activities.

    “The consequences of such structural inconsistency are psychopathological personality, and/or antisocial conduct, and/or revolutionary activities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ROBeRt K. MeRtoN Harvard University · p. 4

    The illegitimacy adjustment occurs when the individual has assimilated the cultural emphasis on success without equally internalizing the morally prescribed norms governing means for its attainment.

    “As we have seen, this adjustment occurs when the individual has assimilated the cultural emphasis on success without equally internalizing the morally prescribed norms governing means for its attainment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § ROBeRt K. MeRtoN Harvard University · p. 2

    It is unlikely that interiorized norms are completely eliminated; whatever residuum persists will induce personality tensions and conflict.

    “It is unlikely that interiorized norms are completely eliminated. Whatever residuum persists will induce personality tensions and conflict.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ROBeRt K. MeRtoN Harvard University · p. 3

    Retreatism occurs when both culture goals and institutionalized procedures have been assimilated thoroughly but institutionalized procedures promising successful attainment are not available to the individual.

    “This mode of “adjustment” occurs, as far as structural sources are concerned, when both the culture goals and institutionalized procedures have been assimilated thoroughly by the individual and imbued with affect and high positive value, but where those institutionalized procedures which promise a measure of successful attainment of the goals are not available to the individual.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § ROBeRt K. MeRtoN Harvard University · p. 1

    The limiting case is reached when the range of alternative procedures is limited only by technical rather than institutional considerations.

    “The limiting case in this direction is reached when the range of alternative procedures is limited only by technical rather than institutional considerations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ROBeRt K. MeRtoN Harvard University · p. 4

    The dominant pressure of group standards of success is on the gradual attenuation of legitimate but ineffective strivings and the increasing use of illegitimate but more or less effective expedients of vice and crime.

    “The dominant pressure of group standards of success is, therefore, on the gradual attenuation of legitimate, but by and large ineffective, strivings and the increasing use of illegitimate, but more or less effective, expedients of vice and crime.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
12 of 12
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The individual's subjective evaluation of the situation is a major determinant of the response.

    “Manifestly, these objective changes are not alone significant; the individual's subjective evaluation of the situation is a major determinant of the response.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The same body of success-symbols is held to be desirable for all.

    “The same body of success-symbols is held to be desirable for all.”
2 of 2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Merton, R. K.
Venue
Gangs
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2017-11-30
Pages
3-13
OpenAlex
W2319178948
Cited by
3,689
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 147 · 2020: 157 · 2019: 199 · 2018: 177 · 2017: 175 · 2016: 169 · 2015: 199 · 2014: 182 · 2013: 201 · 2012: 180
FWCI
1115.96
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Emile Durkheim and Sociology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
social structure, anomie, means and ends, social codes, antisocial behavior, ambition, anxiety, class structure, social integration, American culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review