The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE FAMILIAL TRANSMISSION OF CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS*
Abstract
This article examines the familial transmission of criminal convictions in families in the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. Our main analyses focus on the 344 families in the Cambridge Study with two or more children. Criminal convictions were highly familial because convictions in a parent increased the risk of convictions in a child. Correlations between siblings were stronger in same‐sex siblings (.45 to .50) than in opposite‐sex ones (.27). Sibling correlations did not vary by birth order. Convictions of mothers and father correlated .55. Parent‐child correlations were about the same as within‐generation correlations between siblings. LISREL models were used to assess whether the effect of parental convictions on child convictions was direct or mediated through the quality of the family environment (i.e., supervision. child rearing, and family size). The best fitting LISREL models suggested a direct effect of parental convictions on child convictions, without any mediation by family environment. These data on fill biological siblings, however, did not permit separate estimation of family environmental versus genetic effects. One environmental effect appeared, however—a socialization effect among siblings; in families with three sons, there appeared to be mutual influence of one sibling on another. Also, regression models based on the boys suggested that family environmental variables did add to parental criminality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families
Neale, M. C., & Cardon, L. R. (1992) · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8018-2 · Cited by 4,005
The Nature of Nurture: Genetic Influence on “Environmental” Measures
Plomin, R., & Bergeman, C. S. (1991) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00070278 · Cited by 556
Reich, T., Cloninger, C. R., & Guze, S. B. (1975) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.127.1.1 · Cited by 199
Cited by
Bonta, J. L., Law, M. A., & Hanson, K. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.123.2.123 · Cited by 1,250
Physical Aggression During Early Childhood: Trajectories and Predictors
Tremblay, R. E., Nagin, D. S., Séguin, J. R., Zoccolillo, M., Zelazo, P. D., Boivin, M., Pérusse, D., & Japel, C. (2004) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.114.1.e43 · Cited by 1,109
Moffitt, T. E. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.533 · Cited by 787
Some benefits of dichotomization in psychiatric and criminological research
Farrington, D. P., & Loeber, R. (2000) · Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health · doi:10.1002/cbm.349 · Cited by 526
Self-citationFARRINGTON, D. P., JOLLIFFE, D., LOEBER, R., STOUTHAMER-LOEBER, M., & KALB, L. M. (2001) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1006/jado.2001.0424 · Cited by 476
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- ROWE, D. C., & FARRINGTON, D. P.
- Venue
- Criminology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 177-202
- ISSN
- 0011-1384 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-9125
- OpenAlex
- W2136031847
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE FAMILIAL TRANSMISSION OF CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1997.tb00874.x
- The paper
- ROWE, D. C., & FARRINGTON, D. P. (1997). THE FAMILIAL TRANSMISSION OF CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS*. Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1997.tb00874.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.