PUBLIC COOPERATION WITH THE POLICE IN GHANA: DOES PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS MATTER?*
Abstract
Recent criminological emphasis on the salience of normative concerns, such as procedural fairness and legitimacy, in understanding public law‐abiding behavior has been based on evidence from Anglo‐American studies. This article examines these issues in the African context based on general survey data from Accra, Ghana. The results show a lack of empirical validity, in the Ghanaian context, of the Sunshine–Tyler legitimacy scale. The results also show that public cooperation with the police in Ghana is shaped by utilitarian factors such as perceptions of current police effectiveness infighting crime. It is argued that the importance of perceived police effectiveness to public cooperation is a result of police legitimation deficits and the public's alienation from the Ghana police, which in turn are traced to the colonial history of the police and current poor police performance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Public Satisfaction With Police: Using Procedural Justice to Improve Police Legitimacy
Hinds, L., & Murphy, K. (2007) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1375/acri.40.1.27 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Viewing Things Differently: The Dimensions of Public Perceptions of Police Legitimacy
Tankebe, J. (2013) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00291.x · Cited by 890 · see citing works
Self-citationProcedural justice and police legitimacy: a systematic review of the research evidence
Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-013-9175-2 · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Legitimacy and Deterrence Effects in Counterterrorism Policing: A Study of Muslim Americans
Tyler, T. R., Schulhofer, S., & Huq, A. Z. (2010) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5893.2010.00405.x · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Legitimacy in Policing: A Systematic Review
Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013) · Campbell Systematic Reviews: Better Evidence for a Better World · doi:10.4073/csr.2013.1 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
“Moreover, he concludes that in contexts where consent and cooperation are often elicited by force, procedural justice concerns may be less important for police legitimacy and cooperation (Tankebe, 2009).”
BackgroundMeasuring Procedural Justice in Police-Citizen Encounters
Jonathan-Zamir, T., Mastrofski, S. D., & Moyal, S. (2015) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418825.2013.845677 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Mirage of Police Reform: Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy
University at Albany, S., Worden, R. E., McLean, S. J., & John F. Finn Institute for Public Safety, U. (2017) · Luminos · doi:10.1525/luminos.30 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Braga, A. A., MacDonald, J. M., & McCabe, J. E. (2024) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12679 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- TANKEBE, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- TANKEBE, JUSTICE
- ORCID
- TANKEBE, JUSTICE
- Venue
- Criminology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1265-1293
- ISSN
- 0011-1384 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-9125
- OpenAlex
- W2022960731
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 64.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Criminology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Keywords
- public cooperation with police, procedural justice, police legitimacy, utilitarian motivation, police performance, Ghana
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review