Cited by 65Crime Patterns and InterventionsYouth Development and Social SupportSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE AND INEFFECTIVE AFTER‐SCHOOL PROGRAMS TO PREVENT DELINQUENCY AND VICTIMIZATION*

GOTTFREDSON, DENISE C., CROSS, AMANDA, SOULÉ, DAVID A.·2007·Criminology & Public Policy

Abstract

Research Summary: Using multi‐level modeling techniques, this study explores characteristics of 35 after‐school programs (ASPs) that criminological research and theory predict should be related to problem behavior outcomes. Controlling for individual‐level predictors of problem behavior and for the composition of the participating ASPs, several ASP characteristics were found to be related, as predicted, to victimization, substance use, and delinquent behavior. Policy Implications: This study extended previous findings that providing structured programming and small program size are important for reducing problem behavior through ASPs. Our study also found that two characteristics of the program staff are related to reductions in problem behavior: More highly educated staff and a higher percentage male staff were related to reductions in levels of both delinquent behavior and victimization. The study concludes that program structure, staffing, and size are important in producing more positive behavioral outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2007.00437.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recreation instructors often have personal experience but may not have recognized certification or qualifications, may not be familiar with current pedagogy practices, and as a result children may not experience high quality programming.

    “The instructor often has personal experience participating in the activity, but may not necessarily have recognized certification or qualifications to instruct it.Instructors may not be familiar with current pedagogy practices and as a result, children may not experience high quality programming (Cross et al., 2010;Gottfredson et al., 2007;Lerner et al., 2005;Zarrett et al., 2008).”
  • Many physical activity programs in the recreation sector are mainly developed based on convenience and instructor availability rather than on established credentials and current pedagogy practices.

    “Such pathways of intentionally designed models fail to exist in the recreation sector where many physical activity (PA) programs are mainly developed based on convenience and instructor availability rather than on established credentials and current pedagogy practices.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GOTTFREDSON, D. C., CROSS, A., & SOULÉ, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
Criminology & Public Policy
Published
2007-05
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
289-318
ISSN
  • 1538-6473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9133
OpenAlex
W2141691905
Cited by
65
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
18.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Criminology & Public Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
after-school programs, juvenile delinquency prevention, victimization, substance use, program characteristics, program staffing, employee training, program size, structured programming, program effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review