Cited by 42Crime Patterns and InterventionsYouth Development and Social SupportNight-time city culture

The impact of after‐school programs on the routine activities of middle‐school students: Results from a randomized, controlled trial*

Cross, Amanda Brown, Gottfredson, Denise C., Wilson, Denise M., Rorie, Melissa, Connell, Nadine·2009·Criminology & Public Policy

Abstract

Research Summary Unsupervised after‐school time for adolescents is a concern for parents and policymakers alike. Evidence linking unsupervised adolescent socializing to problem behavior outcomes heightens this concern among criminologists. Routine activities theory suggests that, when youth peer groups congregate away from adult authority, both opportunity for and motivation to engage in deviant acts increase. After‐school programs are a possible solution to unsupervised teen socializing during afternoon hours and are much in demand. However, empirical research has yet to test the relationship between the availability of after‐school programs and youth routine activities. This study presents evidence from a multisite, randomized, controlled trial of an after‐school program for middle‐school students in an urban school district. Policy Implications Youth in the treatment group engaged in less unsupervised socializing after school than youth in the control group but not as much less as would be expected if the after‐school program was providing consistent supervision to youth who would otherwise be unsupervised. Additional analyses examined why the influence of the after‐school program was not more pronounced. We found that, although program attendance was related to decreases in unsupervised socializing, the program did not attract many delinquency‐prone youths who were unsupervised, which suggests that the students most in need of the program did not benefit. Furthermore, data obtained from a mid‐year activity survey revealed that youth in the study were highly engaged in a variety of after‐school activities. The addition of the after‐school program into the mixture of available activities had little effect on the frequency with which students participated in organized activities after school.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2009.00555.x

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cross, A. B., Gottfredson, D. C., Wilson, D. M., Rorie, M., & Connell, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Rowan University (US)
Venue
Criminology & Public Policy
Published
2009-05
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
391-412
ISSN
  • 1538-6473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9133
OpenAlex
W2089524032
Cited by
42
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Criminology & Public Policy (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Night-time city culture
Keywords
after-school programs, routine activity theory, junior high school students, juvenile delinquency, after-school activities, urban schools, program attendance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review