Cited by 101Physical Activity and HealthPhysical Education and PedagogySchool Health and Nursing Education

An integrated curriculum approach to increasing habitual physical activity in children: a feasibility study

Oliver, Melody, Schofield, Grant, McEvoy, Erin·2006·Journal of School Health

Abstract

A relatively new concept is that of "integrating" physical activity throughout the school curriculum, thereby teaching children about lifestyle physical activity in a variety of contexts. One method by which this may be achieved is by utilizing pedometers as a motivational and educational tool for measuring accumulated physical activity. No research is available that shows in-depth integration of physical activity into the curriculum or that investigates the efficacy of pedometer use for this purpose. The purposes of this study were to (1) design and implement a 4-week elementary school curriculum unit, based around pedometer walking and (2) quantify, using pedometry, the physical activity levels of children (N = 78) prior to, and during, the unit implementation. Results showed that more than one half of the participants were achieving >15,000 steps daily, and children were significantly more active on weekdays than weekends (p = .0001). Boys were more active than girls at baseline (p = .01) and during intervention weekdays (p = .03). Differences between baseline and intervention weekdays were nonsignificant for the complete sample; however, significant increases in step counts were observed when the children with low activity levels, especially females, were examined separately. Overall, the integration of physical activity using pedometer-based activities is feasible. However, any increases in activity may be restricted to children who are least active.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00071.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oliver, M., Schofield, G., & McEvoy, E.
Affiliations
Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Venue
Journal of School Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-02
Volume
76
Issue
2
Pages
74-79
ISSN
  • 0022-4391 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-1561
OpenAlex
W2090685615
Cited by
101
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of School Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
curriculum integration, physical activity, children, pedometers, step count, elementary school, physical activity promotion, school-based intervention, feasibility, sex differences, weekday and weekend differences
MeSH terms
Child, Curriculum, Feasibility Studies, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Motivation, Motor Activity, Periodicity, Physical Education and Training, School Health Services, Time Factors, Walking, Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review