Effects of a School-Based Nutrition Program Diffused Throughout a Large Urban Community on Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviors Related to Fruit and Vegetable Consumption
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Obesity among US children has increased in recent years. Although increased fruit and vegetable consumption has not been directly linked to obesity prevalence, it has been posited that more fruits and vegetables (FV) could reduce the consumption of high-fat, energy-dense foods and may protect against childhood illnesses including asthma and other respiratory diseases. The purpose of this current research was to assess the impact of a large public school district's hybrid approach to nutrition education programming on attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors related to fruit and vegetable consumption. METHODS: A total of 12 elementary schools from the Los Angeles Unified School District (9 intervention schools, 3 control schools) were randomly selected to participate in a "hybrid" school-based nutrition education program. Data were collected at baseline (beginning of school year) and postintervention data (end of school year 9 months later). Linear mixed models were developed to assess the impact of the intervention. RESULTS: The intervention resulted in a significant change in teacher influence on students' attitudes toward FV (p < .05) and students' attitudes toward vegetables (p < .01), even after adjusting for gender, grade, and race/ethnicity. Although not statistically significant, there was a slight increase in fruit and vegetable consumption from pretest to posttest for both the intervention and control schools. CONCLUSION: The hybrid model reflects a more accurate representation of school-based interventions. More research is needed to identify the specific components of this model that are most successful in impacting fruit and vegetable consumption among US children.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In 18 of the 21 included studies, the stated primary outcome was improved knowledge of nutrition or obesity prevention.
“In 18 of the 21 studies [43–59, 61–64], the stated primary outcome was improved knowledge of nutrition or obesity prevention, highlighting the field’s didactic focus.”
From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [52]
The Article section states that this study assessed fruit-and-vegetable consumption, attitudes, beliefs, and perceived social influences—not improved nutrition or obesity-prevention knowledge as a primary outcome. The paper also does not report a count of primary outcomes across 21 studies. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredNutrition education covering definitions, food groups, and nutrient functions was included in 20 intervention programs.
“Nutrition education—covering definitions, food groups, and nutrient functions—was included in 20 intervention programs [43–59, 62–64].”
From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [52]
The Instruments section describes this study’s intervention as including nutrition education activities, so the paper supports its inclusion as an example of a nutrition-education program. It does not specify that the education covered definitions, food groups, or nutrient functions. The count of 20 programs is an aggregate claim across the cited studies, not a count established by this paper alone. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBehavioral and decision-oriented components were common in included interventions and included food choice, planning, goal-setting, portion awareness, self-efficacy, intention formation, and family or peer reinforcement.
“Behavioral and decision-oriented components were likewise common and included food choice, planning, goal-setting, portion awareness, self-efficacy, intention formation, and family or peer reinforcement [43, 44, 46, 47, 50, 52–56, 61–63].”
From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [52]
The Article introduction describes school nutrition interventions as having behavioral components that reinforce self-efficacy and decision-making skills. The Instruments section describes this study’s activities, including introducing children to produce, but does not identify planning, goal-setting, portion awareness, or intention formation as components; peer and parent influence were measured rather than established as reinforcement components of the intervention. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredA substantial proportion of included interventions incorporated experiential and skill-based learning, particularly cooking, food preparation, tasting, and sensory activities.
“A substantial proportion of interventions incorporated experiential and skill-based learning, particularly cooking, food preparation, tasting, and sensory activities [45–48, 50, 52, 56, 59–61, 63].”
From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [52]
The Instruments section describes an intervention that brought chefs to schools and introduced students to new produce; the Discussion says students had opportunities to try new foods. This supports tasting as an experiential activity, but the paper does not establish that students cooked or prepared food, describe sensory activities, or quantify the proportion of interventions using these approaches. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSensory activities, such as repeated tasting, comparing varieties of fruits and vegetables, and discussing flavor, texture, and appearance, were used in included interventions to support acceptance of healthy foods.
“Sensory activities, such as repeated tasting, comparing varieties of fruits and vegetables, and discussing flavor, texture, and appearance, were used to support acceptance of healthy foods [46, 52, 61].”
From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [52]
The Discussion describes Harvest of the Month as giving students opportunities to try new produce, with the expectation that exposure would increase fruit and vegetable consumption. It does not describe repeated tasting, comparing varieties, or discussing flavor, texture, and appearance as intervention activities. The reported increase in consumption was not significant. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Communication skills and social norms were targeted in included interventions through peer, parent, and teacher involvement.
“Communication skills and social norms were targeted through peer, parent, and teacher involvement [52, 61], while media literacy—though addressed less frequently—focused on interpreting advertisements and understanding environmental impacts of food choices [43, 44].”
From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [52]
The Instruments section describes teachers delivering the nutrition program, and the Discussion reports teacher messages and examines peer and parent influence on students’ fruit-and-vegetable attitudes. But the paper does not say the intervention targeted communication skills or social norms through peer and parent involvement; the Discussion instead suggests more structured activities to engage parents. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIntervention components and curriculum content were delivered predominantly through school-based, classroom-oriented formats, reported in 18 studies.
“Intervention components and curriculum content were delivered predominantly through school-based, classroom-oriented formats, which were reported in 18 studies [43–47, 49, 51–59, 61–63].”
From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [52]
Classroom teachers were the principal facilitators in 19 included studies, often after brief training.
“Classroom teachers were the principal facilitators in 19 studies [43–49, 51–57, 59, 61–64], often after brief training.”
From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [52]
Meta-regression with a binary country variable (USA vs. other) yielded β ≈ −0.08 (95% CI: −0.47 to 0.31; p ≈ 0.56), indicating that the effects on nutritional behavior did not differ in any straightforward way between US and non-US trials.
“Meta-regression with a binary country variable (USA [50, 52, 56] vs. other [46, 61]) yielded β ≈ −0.08 (95% CI: −0.47 to 0.31; p ≈ 0.56), indicating that the effects on nutritional behavior did not differ in any straightforward way between US and non-US trials.”
From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [52]
Food and nutrition literacy, general nutrition knowledge, and obesity-related knowledge generally improved following intervention, although the magnitude and consistency of effects varied across studies.
“Including food and nutrition literacy, general nutrition knowledge, and obesity-related knowledge, generally improved following intervention, although the magnitude and consistency of effects varied across studies [43–55].”
From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [52]
The Discussion and Conclusion report outcomes for fruit-and-vegetable attitudes, consumption, and perceived influences, not changes in food and nutrition literacy, general nutrition knowledge, or obesity-related knowledge. A search for knowledge found discussion of nutrition education and an expectation about parental knowledge, but no result establishing the claimed post-intervention improvements in this study. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredConsistent improvements in knowledge-related outcomes were reported across several studies.
“Consistent improvements in knowledge-related outcomes were also reported across several studies [45, 48, 51–55].”
From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [52]
The Data Collection and Data Analysis sections describe measures of attitudes, beliefs, fruit and vegetable consumption, and perceived influences, but not a knowledge outcome. A search for “knowledge” found discussion of an assumed increase and a separate parent intervention, not a reported improvement in knowledge in this study. Our copy therefore cannot verify the claim as attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPractical skill practice (gardening, cooking, label reading, game-based challenges) appeared in 13 studies.
“Practical skill practice (gardening, cooking, label reading, game-based challenges) appeared in 13 studies [43, 45, 47–50, 52, 53, 55, 58, 61, 63, 64].”
From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [52]
The Intervention description (indexed under Instruments; page unavailable) lists visits from chefs and farmers, art, and a program introducing new produce. The Discussion (page unavailable) says students could try new foods, but neither passage establishes that they practiced a practical skill. Searches for gardening, cooking, and hands-on activities did not find a documented skill-practice component; this single paper also cannot establish the citing document’s count of 13 studies. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredTools such as goal-setting worksheets, self-monitoring logs, and home tasks were used in included interventions to help children monitor and adjust their behaviors over time.
“Tools such as goal-setting worksheets, self-monitoring logs, and home tasks were used to help children monitor and adjust their behaviors over time [52, 56, 63].”
From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [52]
The Instruments section describes flexible school nutrition activities but does not identify goal-setting worksheets, student self-monitoring logs, or home tasks. The Activity Logs section says teachers used logs to record instruction, not children’s behavior; the Discussion proposes homework activities as a possible future approach. Our copy therefore does not establish that the claimed tools were used in this intervention. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 25,810 · see citing works
Social Foundations of Thought and Action
Bandura, A. (2002) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446221129.n6 · Cited by 9,948 · see citing works
(2006) · PubMed · Cited by 3,378 · see citing works
Translating Social Ecological Theory into Guidelines for Community Health Promotion
Stokols, D. (1996) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/0890-1171-10.4.282 · Cited by 2,763 · see citing works
High body mass index for age among US children and adolescents, 2003-2006.
Ogden, C. L. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.299.20.2401 · Cited by 1,850 · see citing works
Childhood overweight: a contextual model and recommendations for future research
Davison, K. K., & Birch, L. (2001) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1046/j.1467-789x.2001.00036.x · Cited by 1,431 · see citing works
Reducing Obesity via a School-Based Interdisciplinary Intervention Among Youth
Gortmaker, S. L., Peterson, K. E., Wiecha, J. L., Sobol, A. M., Dixit, S., Fox, M. K., & Laird, N. M. (1999) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.153.4.409 · Cited by 1,335 · see citing works
Nishida, C., Uauy, R., Kumanyika, S., & Shetty, P. (2004) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2003592 · Cited by 744 · see citing works
Relation Between Dieting and Weight Change Among Preadolescents and Adolescents
Field, A. E., Austin, S. B., Taylor, C. B., Malspeis, S., Rosner, B., Rockett, H. R., Gillman, M. W., & Colditz, G. A. (2003) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.112.4.900 · Cited by 631 · see citing works
Gortmaker, S. L., Cheung, L. W. Y., Peterson, K. E., Chomitz, G., Cradle, J. H., Dart, H., Fox, M. K., Bullock, R. B., Sobol, A. M., Colditz, G. A., et al. (1999) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.153.9.975 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Gimme 5 Fruit, Juice, and Vegetables for Fun and Health: Outcome Evaluation
Baranowski, T., Davis, M. A., Resnicow, K., Baranowski, J. C., Doyle, C., Lin, L. S., Smith, M. J., & Wang, D. T. (2000) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/109019810002700109 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
School-based nutrition education: lessons learned and new perspectives
Pérez‐Rodrigo, C., & Bartrina, J. A. (2001) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2000108 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
School‐Based Obesity Interventions: A Literature Review
Shaya, F. T., Flores, D., Gbarayor, C. M., & Wang, J. (2008) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00285.x · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Theory-based Data Analysis for the Social Sciences
Aneshensel, C. S. (2002) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412986342 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Anderson, A., Porteous, L., Foster, E., Higgins, C., Stead, M., Hetherington, M., Ha, M.-A., & Adamson, A. (2005) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2004721 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Obesity Prevalence Among Low-Income, Preschool-Aged Children--United States, 1998-2008
(2009) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e552022010-002 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Young adolescents' nutrition assessment on computer (YANA-C)
Vereecken, C. A., Covents, M., Matthys, C., & Maes, L. (2005) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602124 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
The ecology of childhood overweight: a 12-year longitudinal analysis
O'Brien, M., Nader, P. R., Houts, R., Bradley, R., Friedman, S. L., Belsky, J., & Susman, E. J. (2007) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0803611 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Effects of the CATCH physical education intervention: teacher type and lesson location
McKenzie, T. L., Stone, E. J., Feldman, H. A., Epping, J. N., Yang, M., Strikmiller, P. K., Lytle, L. A., & Parcel, G. S. (2001) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00335-x · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Hart, K. H., Herriot, A. M., Bishop, J. A., & Truby, H. (2003) · Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1046/j.1365-277x.2003.00429.x · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Obesity Prevention in Early Adolescence: Student, Parent, and Teacher Views
Power, T. G., Bindler, R. C. M., Goetz, S., & Daratha, K. (2009) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00461.x · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Nutrition and respiratory health in children in six Central and Eastern European countries
Antova, T. (2003) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thorax.58.3.231 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Elder, J. P., Arredondo, E. M., Campbell, N. R., Baquero, B. I., Duerksen, S. C., Ayala, G. X., Crespo, N. C., Slymen, D. J., & McKenzie, T. L. (2009) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00462.x · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Edmunds, L. (2002) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/17.2.211 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Slusser, W. M., Cumberland, W. G., Browdy, B. L., Lange, L., & Neumann, C. G. (2007) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980007000444 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationThe school setting: an opportunity for the implementation of dietary guidelines
Pérez‐Rodrigo, C., Klepp, K., Yngve, A., Sjöstróm, M., Stockley, L., & Bartrina, J. A. (2001) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2001162 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Role of Classroom Teachers in Nutrition and Physical Education
Prelip, M. L., Erausquin, J. T., Slusser, W. M., et al. (2006) · Californian Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.32398/cjhp.v4i3.1963 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationPrelip, M. L., Thai, C. L., Erausquin, J. T., & Slusser, W. M. (2011) · Health Education · doi:10.1108/09654281111161220 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hackman, C., & Knowlden, A. (2014) · Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics · doi:10.2147/ahmt.s56207 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Cunningham-Sabo, L., Lohse, B., Smith, S., Browning, R., Strutz, E., Nigg, C., Balgopal, M., Kelly, K., & Ruder, E. (2016) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3118-6 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Posri, S., Powwattana, A., Lagampan, S., Chongsuwat, R., Boonmanunt, S. W., & Wongkampun, S. (2026) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-026-27909-w
“A substantial proportion of interventions incorporated experiential and skill-based learning, particularly cooking, food preparation, tasting, and sensory activities [45–48, 50, 52, 56, 59–61, 63].”
Influential
- Authors
- Prelip, M., Slusser, W., Thai, C. L., Kinsler, J., & Erausquin, J. T.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Prelip, Michael
- Venue
- Journal of School Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-08-11
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 520-529
- ISSN
- 0022-4391 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101665756
- Semantic Scholar
- b7ea5ce53d5dd9fac293012778a278bb1ab835d4
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 7.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- libres.uncg.edu
- Locations
- Journal of School Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Keywords
- school-based nutrition education, fruit and vegetable intake, childhood obesity, teacher influence, elementary school students, Los Angeles Unified School District, urban public schools
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Child Welfare, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Educational Measurement, Female, Fruit, Health Education, Health Promotion, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Nutrition Surveys, Nutritional Status, Peer Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, School Health Services, Schools, Urban Population, Vegetables, Program Evaluation, Chi-Square Distribution, Program Development, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review