Cited by 73Obesity, Physical Activity, DietNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorSchool Health and Nursing Education

Effects of a School-Based Nutrition Program Diffused Throughout a Large Urban Community on Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviors Related to Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

Open access
Prelip, Michael, Slusser, Wendelin, Thai, Chan L., Kinsler, Janni, Erausquin, Jennifer T.·2011·Journal of School Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity among US children has increased in recent years. Although increased fruit and vegetable consumption has not been directly linked to obesity prevalence, it has been posited that more fruits and vegetables (FV) could reduce the consumption of high-fat, energy-dense foods and may protect against childhood illnesses including asthma and other respiratory diseases. The purpose of this current research was to assess the impact of a large public school district's hybrid approach to nutrition education programming on attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors related to fruit and vegetable consumption. METHODS: A total of 12 elementary schools from the Los Angeles Unified School District (9 intervention schools, 3 control schools) were randomly selected to participate in a "hybrid" school-based nutrition education program. Data were collected at baseline (beginning of school year) and postintervention data (end of school year 9 months later). Linear mixed models were developed to assess the impact of the intervention. RESULTS: The intervention resulted in a significant change in teacher influence on students' attitudes toward FV (p < .05) and students' attitudes toward vegetables (p < .01), even after adjusting for gender, grade, and race/ethnicity. Although not statistically significant, there was a slight increase in fruit and vegetable consumption from pretest to posttest for both the intervention and control schools. CONCLUSION: The hybrid model reflects a more accurate representation of school-based interventions. More research is needed to identify the specific components of this model that are most successful in impacting fruit and vegetable consumption among US children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00622.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 18 of the 21 included studies, the stated primary outcome was improved knowledge of nutrition or obesity prevention.

    “In 18 of the 21 studies [43–59, 61–64], the stated primary outcome was improved knowledge of nutrition or obesity prevention, highlighting the field’s didactic focus.”

    From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Article section states that this study assessed fruit-and-vegetable consumption, attitudes, beliefs, and perceived social influences—not improved nutrition or obesity-prevention knowledge as a primary outcome. The paper also does not report a count of primary outcomes across 21 studies. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Nutrition education covering definitions, food groups, and nutrient functions was included in 20 intervention programs.

    “Nutrition education—covering definitions, food groups, and nutrient functions—was included in 20 intervention programs [43–59, 62–64].”

    From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Instruments section describes this study’s intervention as including nutrition education activities, so the paper supports its inclusion as an example of a nutrition-education program. It does not specify that the education covered definitions, food groups, or nutrient functions. The count of 20 programs is an aggregate claim across the cited studies, not a count established by this paper alone. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Behavioral and decision-oriented components were common in included interventions and included food choice, planning, goal-setting, portion awareness, self-efficacy, intention formation, and family or peer reinforcement.

    “Behavioral and decision-oriented components were likewise common and included food choice, planning, goal-setting, portion awareness, self-efficacy, intention formation, and family or peer reinforcement [43, 44, 46, 47, 50, 52–56, 61–63].”

    From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Article introduction describes school nutrition interventions as having behavioral components that reinforce self-efficacy and decision-making skills. The Instruments section describes this study’s activities, including introducing children to produce, but does not identify planning, goal-setting, portion awareness, or intention formation as components; peer and parent influence were measured rather than established as reinforcement components of the intervention. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A substantial proportion of included interventions incorporated experiential and skill-based learning, particularly cooking, food preparation, tasting, and sensory activities.

    “A substantial proportion of interventions incorporated experiential and skill-based learning, particularly cooking, food preparation, tasting, and sensory activities [45–48, 50, 52, 56, 59–61, 63].”

    From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Instruments section describes an intervention that brought chefs to schools and introduced students to new produce; the Discussion says students had opportunities to try new foods. This supports tasting as an experiential activity, but the paper does not establish that students cooked or prepared food, describe sensory activities, or quantify the proportion of interventions using these approaches. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sensory activities, such as repeated tasting, comparing varieties of fruits and vegetables, and discussing flavor, texture, and appearance, were used in included interventions to support acceptance of healthy foods.

    “Sensory activities, such as repeated tasting, comparing varieties of fruits and vegetables, and discussing flavor, texture, and appearance, were used to support acceptance of healthy foods [46, 52, 61].”

    From Effects of school-based nutrition literacy Intervention on obesity prevention in school-age students: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Discussion describes Harvest of the Month as giving students opportunities to try new produce, with the expectation that exposure would increase fruit and vegetable consumption. It does not describe repeated tasting, comparing varieties, or discussing flavor, texture, and appearance as intervention activities. The reported increase in consumption was not significant. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prelip, M., Slusser, W., Thai, C. L., Kinsler, J., & Erausquin, J. T.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Prelip, Michael
Venue
Journal of School Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08-11
Volume
81
Issue
9
Pages
520-529
ISSN
0022-4391 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101665756
Cited by
73
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of School Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
school-based nutrition education, fruit and vegetable intake, childhood obesity, teacher influence, elementary school students, Los Angeles Unified School District, urban public schools
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Welfare, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Educational Measurement, Female, Fruit, Health Education, Health Promotion, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Nutrition Surveys, Nutritional Status, Peer Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, School Health Services, Schools, Urban Population, Vegetables, Program Evaluation, Chi-Square Distribution, Program Development, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review