Cited by 132Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Systematic Review of Social Network Analysis in Adolescent Cigarette Smoking Behavior*

Seo, Dong‐Chul, Huang, Yan·2012·Journal of School Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social networks are important in adolescent smoking behavior. Previous research indicates that peer context is a major causal factor of adolescent smoking behavior. To date, however, little is known about the influence of peer group structure on adolescent smoking behavior. METHODS: Studies that examined adolescent social networks with regard to their cigarette smoking behavior were identified through online and manual literature searches. Ten social network analysis studies involving a total of 28,263 adolescents were included in the final review. RESULTS: Of the 10 reviewed studies, 6 identify clique members, liaisons, and isolates as contributing factors to adolescent cigarette smoking. Significantly higher rates of smoking are noted among isolates than clique members or liaisons in terms of peer network structure. Eight of the reviewed studies indicate that peer selection or influence precedes adolescents' smoking behavior and intent to smoke. Such peer selection or influence accounts for a large portion of similarities among smoking adolescents. CONCLUSION: Adolescents who are identified as isolates are more likely to smoke and engage in risk‐taking behaviors than others in the peer network structure. Given that the vast majority of current adult smokers started their smoking habits during adolescence, adolescent smoking prevention efforts will likely benefit from incorporating social network analytic approaches and focusing the efforts on isolates and other vulnerable adolescents from a peer selection and influence perspective.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00663.x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seo, D., & Huang, Y.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Seo, Dong‐Chul
Venue
Journal of School Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12-06
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
21-27
ISSN
  • 0022-4391 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-1561
OpenAlex
W2074241539
Cited by
132
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of School Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
adolescent smoking, peer networks, social network analysis, peer selection, peer influence, cliques, smoking prevention, risk-taking
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Choice Behavior, Female, Group Structure, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Loneliness, Male, Peer Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Smoking, Social Behavior, Social Class, Tobacco Use Disorder, United States, Prevalence, Behavior, Addictive, Friends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review